Pages

SATOR AREPO TENET OPERA

SATOR AREPO TENET OPERA
The Magic Square

Illuminatus



There is a lot of conspiracy regarding The Illuminati.


This page is to shine a light on an order who had a real purpose that was there to support every woman and man to realise the truth and the divine potential.

"As Weishaupt lived under the tyranny of a despot and priests, he knew that caution was necessary even in spreading information, and the principles of pure morality. This has given an air of mystery to his views, was the foundation of his banishment.... If Weishaupt had written here, where no secrecy is necessary in our endeavors to render men wise and virtuous, he would not have thought of any secret machinery for that purpose."
- Thomas Jefferson

Adam Weishaupt founded the Illuminati of Bavaria on May 1, 1776 on the principles of his early training as a Jesuit. Originally called the Order of the Perfectibilists, "its professed object was, by the mutual assistance of its members, to attain the highest possible degree of morality and virtue, and to lay the foundation for the reformation of the world by the association of good men to oppose the progress of moral evil"


The two principal critics of the Illuminati, John Robison and the Abbé Barruel  both published their accusations, theories and "histories" in English. But it has only been in the last few years that the source documents have been translated, allowing the English-speaking world an objective perspective on the order.
This webpage summarizes what was known about the Bavarian Illuminati to the English-speaking world, up until the mid-twentieth century. Serious students should consult Amelia Gill's 2008 translation of Weishaupt's Die Lampe von Diogenese, , Peggy Pawlowski’s 2004 doctoral thesis, ‘Der Beitrag Johann Adam Weishaupts zur Pädagogik des Illuminatismus’, and the works of such German historians as Reinhart Koselleck, Richard van Dülmen, Hermann Schüttler, Reinhard Markner, Monika Neugebauer-Wölk, Manfred Agethen, and Christine Schaubs.


Robison freely admitted that he had scanty knowledge of German and had derived all his information from other writers. Unfortunately neither he nor Barruel were concerned with providing references for their sources. When they do quote from the papers and correspondence of the Order as published by the Bavarian government or the published works of Adam Weishaupt and Adolph Knigge, they also fail to provide context or citations.

Adam Weishaupt (1748 - 1830)


Adam Weishaupt was born February 6, 1748 at Ingolstadt and educated by the Jesuits. His appointment as Professor of Natural and Canon Law at the University of Ingolstadt in 1775, a position previously held by one of the recently disbanded Jesuits, gave, it is said, great offence to the clergy. "Weishaupt, whose views were cosmopolitan, and who knew and condemned the bigotry and superstitions of the Priests, established an opposing party in the University...." 5Weishaupt was not then a freemason; he was initiated into a Lodge of Strict Observance, Lodge Theodore of Good Council (Theodor zum guten Rath), at Munich in 1777


Most information regarding the rituals and objectives of the order is derived from papers and correspondence found in a search of Xavier Zwack’s residence in Landshut on October 11, 1786, and a search of Baron Bassus’s castle of Sondersdorf in Bavaria in 1787. These documents were published by the Bavarian government, under the title: Einige Originalschriften des Illuminaten Ordens, Munich, 1787. Perhaps the best English exposition on the Order is found in Chapter III of Vernon L. Stauffer’s New England and the Bavarian Illuminati, pp. 142-228.
As an example of the mythology that surrounds the history of the Illuminati, note that Barruel claimed that Lanz, an Illuminati courier and apostate priest, was struck by lightning, thus revealing Weishaupt’s papers to the authorities, but this does not appear to be substantiated. This error was widely reprinted and enlarged on by subsequent anti-masons whose lack of research and disdain for historical accuracy has lead them to confuse Johann Jakob Lanz (d.1785), a non-Illuminati secular priest in Erding, and friend of Weishaupt, with Franz Georg Lang, a court advisor in Eichstätt who was active in the Illuminati under the name Tamerlan.


Barruel mistakenly translated "Weltpriester", or secular priest, as apostate priest and subsequent writers such as Webster and Miller have repeated this error. Eckert renamed Weishaupt’s friend as Lanze and had him struck by lightning while carrying dispatches in Silesia. Miller cited Eckert but renamed Lanz as Jacob Lang and placed the lightning strike in Ratisbon. This is a minor detail in the history but it demonstrates the lack of accuracy often displayed by detractors of the Illuminati.
Neither Robison nor Barruel deny that the professed goal of the Order was to teach people to be happy by making them good — to do this by enlightening the mind and freeing it from the dominion of superstition and prejudice. But they refused to accept this at face value. Where Weishaupt and Knigge promoted a freedom from church domination over philosophy and science, Robison and Barruel saw a call for the destruction of the church. Where Weishaupt and Knigge wanted a release from the excesses of state oppression, Robison and Barruel saw the destruction of the state. Where Weishaupt and Knigge wanted to educate women and treat them as intellectual equals, Robison and Barruel saw the destruction of the natural and proper order of society.


The rituals were of a rationalistic and not occult nature. Status as a freemason was not required for initiation into the Order of Illuminati since the fourth, fifth and sixth degrees of Weishaupt and Baron Adolphe-François-Frederic Knigge’s system practically duplicated the three degrees of symbolic Freemasonry. Although Knigge claimed to have a system of ten degrees, the last two appear never to have been fully worked up.



Baron Adolph Knigge (1752 - 1796)


"The Order was at first very popular, and enrolled no less than two thousand names upon its registers.... Its Lodges were to be found in France, Belgium, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Poland, Hungary, and Italy. Knigge, who was one of its most prominent working members, and the auther of several of its Degrees, was a religious man, and would never have united with it had its object been, as has been charged, to abolish Christianity. But it cannot be denied, that in the process of time abuses had crept into the Institution and that by the influence of unworthy men, the system became corrupted; yet the course accusations of Barruel and Robison are known to be exaggerated, and some of them altogether false.... The Edicts [on June 22, 1784, for its suppression] of the Elector of Bavaria [Duke Karl Theodor] were repeated in March and August, 1785 and the Order began to decline, so that by the end of the eighteenth century it had ceased to exist.... it exercised while in prosperity no favorable influence on the masonic institution, nor any unfavorable effect on it by its dissolution."

In 1785 Weishaupt was deprived of his chair and banished with pension from the country. He refused the pension and moved to Regensburg, subsequently finding asylum with Ernst II, Duke of Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg. Weishaupt was later appointed a professor at the University of Gottingen, remaining there until his death on 18 November 1830.


Henry Wilson Coil describes the order as a "short lived, meteoric and controversial society" while George Kenning refers to it as a "mischievous association".In his own defense, Weishaupt wrote:
"Whoever does not close his ear to the lamentations of the miserable, nor his heart to gentle pity; whoever is the friend and brother of the unfortunate; whoever has a heart capable of love and friendship; whoever is steadfast in adversity, unwearied in the carrying out of whatever has been once engaged in, undaunted in the overcoming of difficulties; whoever does not mock and despise the weak; whose soul is susceptible of conceiving great designs, desirous of rising superior to all base motives, and of distinguishing himself by deeds of benevolence; whoever shuns idleness; whoever considers no knowledge as unessential which he may have the opportunity of acquiring, regarding the knowledge of mankind as his chief study; whoever, when truth and virtue are in question, despising the approbation of the multitude, is sufficiently courageous to follow the dictates of his own heart, - such a one is a proper candidate."
"The tenor of my life has been the opposite of everything that is vile; and no man can lay any such thing to my charge."
As regards any information derived from the celebrated anti-mason, John Robison  "In the (London) Monthly Magazine for January 1798 there appeared a letter from Böttiger, Provost of the College of Weimar, in reply to Robison’s work, charging that writer with making false statements, and declaring that since 1790 'every concern [sic] of the Illuminati has ceased.' Böttiger also offered to supply any person in Great Britain, alarmed at the erroneous statements contained in the book above mentioned, with correct information."
Following is a short list of the more notable members: 


Adam WeishauptProfessor
Adolph Von KniggeBaron
Xavier von ZwackLawyer, judge and electoral councillor
Christoph Friedrich Nicolai [Nicholai]Bookseller
WestenriederProfessor
HertelCanon
Thomas Maria de BassusBaron
Johann Simon MayrComposer
DietrichMayor of Strasbourg
Johann J. C. BodePrivy councillor
William von BuscheBaron
Saint Germain compte de §
de ConstanzoMarquis
Ferdinand of BrunswickDuke *
Ernst of GothaDuke *
Johann W. Goetheauthor *
                                             Lord Jonathan MacLean-Lambie Occultist

Of the 67 names published by the Abbé Barruel, 10 were professors, 13 were nobles, 7 were in the church, 3 were lawyers and the balance were drawn from the growing middle class: mostly government officials and merchants and a few military officers.

John M. Roberts claims that "[Weishaupt] rapidly rationalized difficulties growing out of his own rashness and taste for intrigue as the product of obscurantism and soon envisaged wider purposes for his society"18 while Robert Gilbert feels that Christopher McIntosh "overestimates the strength and significance of the Illuminati."19
Researchers are directed to a list of books and pamphlets written by Weishaupt found at the end of this paper. A further bibliography can be found in Vernon L. Stauffer’s New England and the Bavarian Illuminati, pp. 185-86. The United Grand Lodge of England Library catalogue includes: P.4. Adam Weishaupt, Uber den allgorischen Geist des Alterthums. Regensburg, 1794. 8vo.
Evidence would suggest that the Bavarian Illuminati was nothing more than a curious historical footnote. Certainly, this is the opinion of masonic writers. Conspiracy theorists though, are not noted for applying Occam’s razor and have decided that there are connections between the Illuminati, Freemasonry, the Trilateral Commission, British Emperialism, International Zionism and communism (if you read the writings of Alberto Rivera and Jack T. Chick of Chino California), that all lead back to the Vatican (or if David Icke is to be believed, the British house of Windsor and extra-terrestrial lizard people) in a bid for world domination. Believe what you will but there is no evidence that any Illuminati survived its founders.

It should be noted that the compiler of these notes, and of the Anti-masonry FAQ, is neither the founder nor the moderator of the newsgroup alt.illuminati. This unmoderated newsgroup was created by Gregg Bloom, a software programmer and systems manager, on 16 April 1993. He never posted to the newsgroup until, in response to this website, Colz Grigor, claiming to be Gregg S. Bloom, posted into alt.illuminati on 22 February 2003. [FNORD] Peter Trei posted the Bavarian Illuminati FAQ in November 1992 and Trevor W. McKeown first posted the Bavarian Illuminati Primer on February 18, 1996. Neither participated in the creation of the newsgroup nor are active in maintaining any archive. While a number of online cataloguers of FAQs have automatically credited Trevor W. McKeown as the newsgroup moderator, this is an error.


After the Bavarian Illuminati
The Encyclopaedia Britannica refers to Illuminati "cells" in an article on eighteenth century Italy as "republican freethinkers, after the pattern recently established in Bavaria by Adam Weishaupt." and as a "rationalistic secret society" in an article on Roman Catholicism. Depending on your perspective, the lack of any detailed information on the Illuminati in the Encyclopaedia Britannica can be ascribed to their current power and secretiveness or to the much simpler explanation that the editors found the order to be of little importance in the flow of history and social development.
It is unfortunate that conspiracy theorists have so confused the issue with claims of Illuminati complicity that the real conspiracies, the real danger to a free and open society, so often go unreported or unremarked.


Elphias Levi made the following unsubstantiated juxapositions in 1860:

"... it was this same memory handed on to secret associations of Rosicrucians, Illuminati and Freemasons which gave a meaning to their strange rites...."
"...under the names of Magic, Manicheanism, Illuminism and Masonry...."
"The maniacal circles of pretended illuminati go back to the bacchantes who murdered Orpheus.
"Long before there was any question of mediums and their evocations in America and France, Prussia had its illuminati and seers, who had habitual communications with the dead."
There is a secret correspondence belonging to the reign [of King Frederick William] which is cited by the Marquis de Luchet in his work against the illuminati..."
More important than the existence of any illuminati after 1784, was the fear that they existed. John M. Roberts, in his Mythology of Secret Societies details this concern of European rulers, and concludes that their oppressive reactions to this fear provoked the very revolutions they sought to prevent. Another insight into how this fear outstripped the facts can be found in Vernon L. Stauffer’s New England and the Bavarian Illuminati (1918).
Although attempts have been made to revive the order, none appear to have survived their founders. As an example, William Westcott, in exchange for the Swedenborgian Rite, received membership in the "Order of the Illuminati" from Theodor Reuss in 1902. Documentation is not available, nor is any explanation or description of this "Order" given.

Illuminati predecessors
These societies are only of interest insofar as they have been claimed by anti-masons and conspiracy theorists to demonstrate a perceived long-term anti-christian conspiracy. There is no similarity between the objectives of these societies and the Bavarian Illuminati.
Hesychasts: Hesychasm is a form of Eastern Christian monastic life requiring uninterrupted prayer. Dating from the 13th century, it was confirmed by the Orthodox Church in 1341, 1347 and 1351, and popularized by the publication of the "Philokalia" in 1782.

Alumbrados: (Spanish : 'enlightened') A mystical movement, at one time led by La Beata de Piedrahita (d. 1511); first recorded about 1492 in Spain (a varient spelling, aluminados, is found in 1498). They believed that the human soul could enter into direct communication with the Holy Spirit and, due to their extravagant claims of visions and revelations, had three edicts issued against them by the Catholic Inquisition, the first on 23 September 1525. According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, "some of its features reappear in the Quietism of the Spaniard Michael de Molinos". Although Ignatius of Loyola— founder of the Jesuits in 1534, and composer of the "Constitutions" of the Society of Jesus — was brought before an ecclesiastical commission in Alcalá in 1527 to determine if his teachings were heretical, he was cleared of any suspicion that he was an alumbrado, He wrote nothing that would suggest he accepted their beliefs. The name translates as 'illuminati' but the name is the only similarity with the later Bavarian Illuminati.
Guérinets: The alumbrados, under the name of Illuminés, arrived in France from Seville in 1623, and were joined in 1634 by Pierre Guérin, curé of Saint-Georges de Roye, whose followers in Picardy and Flanders, known as Guérinets, were suppressed in 1635 (Jean Hermant 1650-1725, Histoire des hérésies, Rouen : 1727). "Another and obscure body of Illuminés came to light in the south of France in 1722, and appears to have lingered till 1794, having affinities with those known contemporaneously in this country as 'French Prophets,' an offshoot of the Camisards." [Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1911 edition.]

Illuminati claimants
Société des Illuminés d'Avignon: Formed by Dom Antoine Joseph de Pernetti and the Polish Count Thaddeus Leszczy Grabianka in Avignon, France in 1786 (Kenning says 1787); later moving to Montpellier as the "Acadamy of True Masons". Although Kloss claims they were in existence in 1812, they would seem to have disappeared in the French Revolution.
Illuminated Theosophists or Chastanier’s Rite: A 1767 modification of Pernetti’s "Hermetic Rite" that later merged with the London Theosophical Society in 1784.
Concordists: A secret order established in Prussia by M. Lang, on the wreck of the Tugendverein (Union of the Virtuous), which latter Body was instituted in 1790 [Miller says 1786] by Henrietta and Marcus Herz as a successor of the Illuminati [or Moses Mendelssohn]. According to Thomas Frost, Secret Societies of the European Revolution, vol. i, p. 183 [cited in Occult Theocrasy, p. 377.] a second Tugendbund was formed by von Stein in 1807. It was suppressed in 1812 by the Prussian Government, on account of its supposed political tendencies, and was revived briefly between 1830-33.
Illuminati claimants
Société des Illuminés d'Avignon: Formed by Dom Antoine Joseph de Pernetti and the Polish Count Thaddeus Leszczy Grabianka in Avignon, France in 1786 (Kenning says 1787); later moving to Montpellier as the "Acadamy of True Masons". Although Kloss claims they were in existence in 1812, they would seem to have disappeared in the French Revolution.
Illuminated Theosophists or Chastanier’s Rite: A 1767 modification of Pernetti’s "Hermetic Rite" that later merged with the London Theosophical Society in 1784.
Concordists: A secret order established in Prussia by M. Lang, on the wreck of the Tugendverein (Union of the Virtuous), which latter Body was instituted in 1790 [Miller says 1786] by Henrietta and Marcus Herz as a successor of the Illuminati [or Moses Mendelssohn]. According to Thomas Frost, Secret Societies of the European Revolution, vol. i, p. 183 [cited in Occult Theocrasy, p. 377.] a second Tugendbund was formed by von Stein in 1807. It was suppressed in 1812 by the Prussian Government, on account of its supposed political tendencies, and was revived briefly between 1830-33.

World League of Illuminati: Allegedly the singer and journalist Theodor Reuss "re-activated" the Order of Illuminati in Munich in 1880. Leopold Engel founded his World League of Illuminati in Berlin in 1893. From these two sprung the Ordo Illuminatorum which was still active in Germany as late as the mid-1970s. Much research has been compiled by Peter-R. Koenig.
Illuminates of Stockholm: The Illuminated Chapter of Swedish Rite Freemasonry is currently composed of approximately 60 past or current Grand Lodge officers who have received the honorary 11th degree. It makes no claim to be related, historically or philisophically, with the Bavarian Illuminati and strictly speaking should not be included in this list.
Die Alte Erleuchtete Seher Bayerns: Alleged by Marc Lachance to have been founded in 1947 by employees of the Munich newspaper, Süddeutsche Zeitung, there are unsubstantiated claims to a longer lineage. With some 100 members claimed in Bavaria, Baden-Württemburg and Thuringia, they have disavowed ritual, and keep organised structure to a minimum.
The Illuminati Order: The Illuminati Order: Founded sometime prior to 1988, this Tallahassee Florida based group was brought online in 2001 by Solomon Tulbure [1969/10/18 - 2004/11/17], one time Grand Master whose idiosyncratic behaviour later estranged him from the group. Currently the Illuminati Order can be found online at illuminati-order.com.

Orden Illuminati: Another addition to the list of claimants to the Illuminati tradition, this group was founded in Spain in 1995 by Gabriel López de Rojas and can be found online at <www.ordeniluminati.com>


Note:

Primary source published texts:Die Bibliothek des Deutschen Freimaurermuseums in Bayreuth - Katalog.
Knigge, Adolph, Freiherr von (1752-1796), Freimaurer- und Illuminatenschriften. Raabe Paul [Editor] Samtliche Werke / Knigge, Adolph, Facsim. of 1781-1873 eds & transcription of MS. München, Sau: Nendeln : KTO, 1978-92.
Nicolai, Christoph Friedrich (3/18/1733 - 1/8/1811), Versuch über die Besschuldigungen welch dem Tempelherrnorden gemacht worden und über dessen Geheimniss; nebst einem Anhange uber das Entstehen der Freimaurergesellschaft. [An Essay on the accusations made against the Order of Knights Templar and their mystery; with an Appendix on the origin of the Fraternity of Freemasons], Berlin: 1782.
Weishaupt, Adam, Die Illuminaten : Quellen und Texte zur Aufklärungsideologie des Illuminatenordens (1776-1785) / herausgegeben von Jan Rachold. Berlin : Akademie-Verlag, 1984. 409 p. ; 20 cm. LCCN: 85111344
Weishaupt, Adam, Die Leuchte des Diogenes oder Prüfung unserer heutigen Moralität und Aufklärung. Regensburg: Montag Š Weiß 1804 [Ratisbon 1805] English translation: Diogenes� Lamp or an Examination of our Present-Day Morality and Enlightenment. Bloomington : The Masonic Book Club, 2008.
Weishaupt, Adam, Über die Selbsterkenntnis. Ihre Hindernisse und Vorteile. Nach dem Original von 1794. [3. Aufl. hrsg. im Auftrage von Ordo Illuminatorum (u.a.) Zürich, Psychosophische Gesellschaft, 1966] 200 p. 15 cm. LCCN: 67106086.
Weishaupt, Adam, Illuminatenorden. Die neuesten Arbeiten des Spartacus und Philo in dem Illuminaten-Orden jetzt zum erstenmal gedruckt und zur Beherzigung bey gegenwärtigen Zeitläuften herausgeben. [n.p.] 1794. 200, 90, 77 p. 20 cm. LCCN: 77465925.
Weishaupt, Adam, Ueber die Gründe und Gewisheit der menschlichen Erkenntniss; zur Prüfung der Kantischen Critik der reinen Vernunft. Nürnberg, in der Grattenauerischen Buchhandlung, 1788. [Bruxelles, Culture et Civilisation, 1969] 204 p. 19 cm. LCCN: 73357961.
Weishaupt, Adam, Apologie der Illuminaten ... Frankfurth und Leipzig [i.e. Nürnberg] In der Grattenauerischen Buchhandlung, 1786. p. cm. Zweifel über die Kantischen Begriffe von Zeit und Raum. LCCN: 09011125.
Weishaupt, Adam, Zweifel über die Kantischen Begriffe von Zeit und Raum. Nürnberg, 1788. [Bruxelles, Culture et Civilisation, 1968] 120 p. 19 cm. LCCN: 79459272.


Additional references:
"Illuminism and the French Revolution". Edinburgh Review. vol. 204, July 1906. pp. 35-60.
Jedediah Morseand the Bavarian Illuminati: An Essay on the Rhetoric of Conspiracy Central States Speech Journal Fall/Winter 1988. pages 293-303.
New England and the Bavarian Illuminati Chapter III, pp. 142-228. Vernon L. Stauffer. 1918. with bibliographical notes.
Bavarian Illuminati FAQ Ver 1.2. Peter Trei. Jan. 1994. Further references to popular usage of the term "Illuminati." Mirrored frequently online. Also see
www.anti-masonry.info/alt.illuminati_FAQ.html.





The French Revolution
and the Bavarian Illuminati


PreambleJohn Robison’s and the Abbé Barruel's attempts to prove a causal link between the Bavarian Illuminati, French Freemasonry and the French Revolution are constructed of errors and falsehoods. The key link is the visit of Bode and von Busche to Paris in 1787, a visit too short and limited to have caused the French Revolution. Although Robison and Barruel are discredited, [1]. many contemporary anti-masonic writers continue to quote from their books.

The following notes are excerpted from a paper presented to the Quatuor Coronati Lodge No. 2076.[2].

A brief chronology of the French Revolution:

February 1787:Assembly of "notables" called by Charles-Alexandre de Calonne
May 5, 1789:Estates-General met at Versaille
July 14, 1789:Parisian rabble seized the Bastille.
Aug 4, 1789:National Assembly abolished feudal regime and tithe
Aug 26, 1789:Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen
October 5, 1789:Paris rabble marched on Versaille, brought King to Paris.
June 20, 1791:Louis XVI tried to flee country.
April 20, 1791:France declares war on Prussia and Austria.
Aug 10, 1792:Revolutionaries occupied Tuileries, imprisoned the royal family.
Jan 21, 1793:Louise XVI executed.
Sept 5, 1793:Reign of Terror (to July 27, 1794)
Oct. 5, 1795:Napoleon crushes Royalist attempt to seize power in Paris.
November 9-10, 1799:Napoleon (18-19 Brumaire) proclaimed end of the revolution.

Introduction
John Robison was initiated in Lodge La Parfaite Intelligence at Liège in March 1770. His interest in Masonry soon wained. In 1773 he was appointed Professor of Natural Philosophy in the University of Edinburgh.
Robison did not interest himself in Masonry again until 1795 when he began composing "Proofs of a Conspiracy against all the Religions and Governments of Europe, Carried on in the Secret Meetings of Freemasons, Illuminati, and Reading Societies."
Independently, the Abbé Barruel, a member of the Jesuit Society, was at work on his "Mémoires pour servir a l'histoire du Jacobinisme." The Abbé published the first two of his four volumes in 1797 and the last two in 1798.3. During the interval, Robison's book appeared. He issued an hurried third edition in 1798, citing, with some satisfaction, the Abbé's first two volumes in a Postscript. 4.
The Abbé, on the other hand, later writes quite critically of Robison's extraordinary liberties in quoting texts.

Robison describes a discourse delivered by Mirabeau at the Lodge des Chevaliers Bienfaisant at Paris. At the time (1770) Mirabeau was twenty years of age, the order of Chevaliers Bienfaisants didn't come into existence in Lyons until 1778 and although there was a Lodge Bienfaisance of the Strict Observence at Paris, it was not constituted until April 10, 1781.
He describes another discourse delivered by Robinet at the Loge des Chevaliers Bienfaisants de la Saint Cité at Lyons, at a Visitation by the Grand Master, Louis Philippe Joseph, the Duke of Chartress, afterwards Orleans, and "Citizen Egalité". In fact, the Duke was not installed until October 23, 1773.
Robison refers to Prince Ferdinand of Brunswick's 1772 election as Grand Master of the Convent of the Strict Observance, as a cause of alarm to the Emperor who feared the Illuminati. Weishaupt was at that time still a professor at Ingolstadt University and the Illuminati unknown.

Robison refers to the Grand Orient de la France as controlling all Freemasonry in France, although records show that both the legitimate Grand Lodge of France and the schismatic Grand Orient continued their separate existence after December 24, 1772. The Strict Observance Lodges were under their own Directories and only related to the Grand Orient by concordant, the oldest dating to 1776.
Although Louis Philippe Joseph, 5th duc d'Orleans from 1785, and later "Citoyen Égalité" (1747/04/13 -1793/11/06) was installed October 23, 1773 as Grand Master of the Grand Orient, by 1787 he was no longer Grand Master. 5
Robison's attack on Freemasonry is dependent on an alleged link between the German Illuminati and French Freemasonry.


The Abbé Augustus Barruel
The Abbé Augustus Barruel was educated by the Jesuits and claims to have unwillingly been initiated as a Master Mason without having made any obligation of secrecy.
Barruel, who in his first two volumes had said little about Weishaupt's Illuminati, changed his attack for his last two volumes. He was aware of Luchet's "Essai sur la Secte Illuminiés" but mistakenly confused the pietist Rose-Croix, made up of Christian Transcendentalist Martinists and followers of the charlatan Cagliostro, with the German rationalists, more conveniently designated the Illuminati.

Barruel owes his information to a freemason and Lutheran pastor, Jean Auguste Starcke, as well as the Viennese journalist, Léopold Aloys Hoffman.
Barruel's knowledge of Paris is confused and inaccurate, as are his references to the four lodges in Paris, Loge des Neuf Soeurs, Loge Contrat Social, Loge des Amis Réunis and Loge Candeur.

Loge des Neuf Soeurs
Barruel claims Condorcet was a member of Neuf Soeurs, although his name appears on no lists. Condorcet was no friend of Lamétherie, whose name does appear on the 1784 Lodge List. Barruel claims Brissot a member of Neuf Soeurs, although Brissot writes that he was initiated into a German lodge but was never active.
Barruel claims Nicolas Bonneville was a member of Neuf Soeurs, although his name appears on no lists and his biographer, Dr. Le Harwel, is of the opinion that he was never a Freemason. Bonneville's "Les Jesuits de la Maçonnerie" was derived from papers he discovered in England and conversations with Masonic friends.
Barruel claims the Abbé Claude Fauchet was a member of Neuf Soeurs, although Fauchet is quoted as claiming "...I have never sought nor desired to be initiated into your mysteries...."
Barruel claims that Neuf Soeurs was anti-monarchist but Romains de Sèze, confident of Marie Antoinette and the advocate who pleaded the cause of Louise XVI before the Revolutionary Tribunal, was a member of the Lodge.
Barruel claims Camille des Moulins and Danton were members of Neuf Soeurs, although the "Observateur" attacks the lodge in April 1790 as an assembly of aristocrats.

The lodge, founded in 1776, ceased to be a Masonic lodge in the beginning of 1790, becoming "le Société Nationale des Neuf Soeurs."
Loge Contrat Social
This lodge, constituted under the Grande Loge de France in 1766, was reconstitute under the Mère Loge Écossaise of Marseilles, later returned to the Grand Lodge of France and in 1773 was again reconstituted under the Grand Orient. This demonstrates that the lodges in France were not all dominated by the Grand Orient under the Duke of Orleans. Freemasonry was not the homogenous body that Barruel and Robison claim it to have been.
Both Barruel and Robison see the defining link between the German Illuminati and Freemasonry in the 1788-1789 visit of Johan Joachim Christopher Bode and the Baron de Busche to the Loge Contrat Social in Paris. Barruel admits his error in his fourth volume but Robison compounds his error. He confuses this lodge with Savalette de Lange's Lodge Amis Réunis, later refering to Savalette as "Savelier." And he muddles together the lodge Chevaliers Bienfaisants, that belonged to the Strict Observance, with Philalèthes, referring to them all as "Amis Réunis."

Barruel, towards the close of his second volume, has the lodge presided over by the Duc de la Rochefoucauld [d'Enville], when, in fact, the rolls show the Master to have been the Marquis de La Rochefoucauld Bayers, a Bourbon loyalist who was massacred at Gissors in 1792. On p. 361 of vol. 4, the Abbé admits his mistake and identifies the source as "Jacques le Suer, the author of "Des Masques Arrachés." a filthy- smelling novel and full of calumnies of most respectable people." Jacques le Suer has been identified as Alexandre Louis Bertrand de Robineau.
Barruel also admits to having seen a letter sent by the Lodge Contrat Social calling on other lodges to rally to the support of Louis XVI as a constitutional monarch. Not being able to honestly brand all masons as Jacobins, Barruel labels them "stupid dupes" and moves on.
Robison claims that Maury, opponent of Talleyrand, Mounier and Barnave were members of Contrat Social. Mounier has warmly denied that he and Barnave were ever Masons. Robison claims Jean Jacques Duval d'Esprémenil was a member of two lodges, Contrat Social, and Chevaliers Bienfaisants, although they belonged to two Grand bodies that did not recognize each other or allow dual membership. Duval is also on record as being an advocate of the Ancien Régime in Church and State and not, as Robison claims, a popular orator for liberty and equality.

While Robison makes Lequinio an officer of Contrat Social, Barruel, who claims to have seen a list of members and would have noted the presence of such a well known anti-cleric, makes no mention of him.
Although Barruel claims to have been made a freemason, he knows little about the lodges in Paris, confusing their names, members, jurisdictions, and meeting places. Robison based his third edition on Barruel's third volume. Barruel's fourth volume recants the Lodge Contrat Social fiction that it was under the rule of the Duc d'Orleans, yet perpetuated a new fiction, that it was "dependent on Edinburgh."
Loge des Amis Réunis
Constituted April 23, 1771 in Paris, this lodge developed a system of 12 "Classes", not Degrees, termed "les Philalèthes ou Cherceurs de la Vérité." Barruel quotes Luchet's fictitious descriptions of the higher degrees and, like Robison, often confuses "clubs" with "lodges."

Barruel claims that Cagliostro was summoned to a meeting of the Amis Réunis where he learned of the revolution. Barruel is referring to the first of two congresses of Philalèthes which met between February 15 and May 26, 1785. Although Cagliostro was invited, he did not attend and in fact wrote disparagingly about them. The agenda of the Congresses have been preserved and contain nothing of a political nature.
Barruel's assertion that Cagliostro received his commission as a revolutionary apostle from Lodge Amis Rèunis contradicts the Inquisition of Rome's assertion that Cagliostro was commissioned at Frankfurt by the "Grand Masters of the Illuminati."
Barruel asserts that the Comte de St. Germain had met in the Lodge Amis Rèunis but, in fact, he had left France ten years before the lodge came into existence.

Rite of Strict Observance and Martinists
Both Barruel and Robison attempt to link the Illuminés of Lyons and Strasbourg with the Bavarian Illuminati, as irreligious and anti-social societies. While Barrual claims that Saint Martin promoted the gnostic error that sins of the flesh inflict no stain on the soul, Saint Martin clearly expressed in "Des Erreurs et de la Verité" the doctrine that these are double sins. Robison makes the same mistake and equally misunderstands the origin of the Rite of Strict Observance.
Although stating he was neither a freemason nor a Martinist, Mounier paid tribute to the Lyon masons who helped contain the violence of the Terror at Lyons on December 5, 1793.

An attempt to link the French lodges with the Illuminati of Bavaria
The key link for both Robison and Barruel is the alleged mission from the Illuminati of Bode and Busche; Barruel assigns this to 1787 while Robison claims it occurred near the end of 1788. Both of them get the lodges names and meeting places wrong.
In July 1784 Weishaupt had parted company with Knigge; by 1786 the Illuminati's secrets were revealed to an indignant public and its chief a fugitive. There was no one to send a mission to Paris.
Johan Joachim Christopher Bode [1730-1793], an energetic member of the Strict Observance, had been invited to the Philalèthes' Congresses. Both he and von Busche arrived in Paris after the second Congress closed on June 8, 1787, although his paper, a denouncement of the study of alchemy and the occult, which he had sent ahead, had been read to the assembly.
He was back in Weimer by 29 August 1787, telling Schiller, and others, that Paris was exhausted and in decay. Körner writes that Bode was "too short a time in Paris to have heard more than one side of the question."

As a further error, Barruel claims that both Bode and Busche were in poverty but, in fact, Busche was a wealthy man. Note that Bode died in 1793 and was not able to defend himself against Robison's and Barruel's claims made in 1797.
Was Mirabeau a Freemason?
There is no evidence that either Mirabeau or Talleyrand were masons. Although Starck asserts that Mirabeau was "Léonidas" in the Illuminati, there is no documentation. Barruel admits in his fourth volume that neither Fauchet, Bailly, nor Lafayette belonged to the Lodge Contrat Social.

Conclusion
Barruel and Robison fail to provide any conclusive link between the Bavarian Illuminati and French Freemasonry, much less find a cause of the Revolution in Paris lodges. They display a great ignorance of the actual and documented workings of Freemasonry at the time, and, in support of their arguments, have made many demonstrably false statements.
Although both Barruel's and Robison's claims have been discredited, many, more contemporary, writers who rely on their books are still accepted as authorities.
Although the list of freemasons who espoused liberty and equality, republicanism and constitutional monarchy, is a long one (Jacques Millanois, Pierre Marie Bruyset, Jean Andre Perisse du Luc, the Chevalier Gaspard de Savaron, and the Compte Henry de Virieu, to name a few), there is no documentation to suggest that the Lodges or Grand Lodges in France took any active role in politics. Many freemasons (such as Adrien Nicolas, Deleutre, Louis Daniel Tassin, and the Abbé Bartolio) were active in maintaining civil order during the riots. Many freemasons were sent to the guillotine or were massacred by the mobs; most Lodges ceased meeting during the Revolutionary period.
Postscript
Another claim, by the Jesuit periodical "Etudes" in 1940, that the Illuminati sent the Comte Kalowait to Paris in 1782, and Falgera in 1784, is equally specious. Neither Weishaupt nor Knigge trusted the Compte who was attracted to the occult studies which the Illuminati leaders held in abhorrence, while Falgera was a novice with no authority or standing in the Order.

1.Also see: William Preston, "The Misrepresentations of Barruel and Robison Exposed", reproduced in George Oliver’s Golden Remains, Vol. 3, pp. 274-300; and also "Anti-Masonry," by Bro. Alphonse Cerza, AQC vol. 80, (1968) Quatuor Coronati Lodge No. 2076, London. pp. 241-270. ^2.Excerpted from "The Romances of Robison and Barruel" by the Rev. W. K. Firminger. F.M. Rickard, editor. Ars Quatuor Coronatorum being the Transactions of the Quatuor Coronati Lodge No. 2076, London." vol. l. 1940. pp. 31-69. ^3.Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism, Written in French by the Abbé Barruel, and translated into English by the Hon. Robert Clifford, F.R.S. & A. S. "Princes and Nations shall disappear from the face of the Earth ... and this revolution shall be the work of secret societies." Weishaupt’s Discourse for the Mysteries. Part I. The Antichristian Conspiracy. Second Edition, revised and corrected. London: Printed for the Translator, by T. Burton, No. 11, Gate-fleet, Lincoln’s-Inn Fields. Sold by E. Booker, No. 56, New Bond-Street. 1798 [Entered at Stationers Hall.] p. 261 ^
4.Proofs of a Conspiracy Against all the Governments of Europe, carried on in the secret meetings of Free Masons, Illuminati, and Reading Societies. Collected from good authorities by John M. Robison, A.M. Professor of Natural Philosophy, and Secretary to the Royal Society of Edinburgh. "Nam tua res agitur paries cum proximus ardet. Edinburgh: Printed for William Creech; — and T. Cadell, Junior, and W. Davies, London. 1797. Entered in Stationers Hall. 496pp plus 35pp postscript to the second edition. "...correct the mistakes into which I have been led by my scanty knowledge of the German language, and the mistakes of the writers from whom I derived all my informations." [Chapter II The Illuminati, pp. 100-271] ^5.Mackey notes his election in 1771 and the Grand Orient declaring his office vacant on May 13, 1793. Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, Albert G. Mackey. Revised. vol. ii. Richmond, Virginia : Macoy Publishing and Masonic Supply Company, Inc., 1966. p. 745. ^

The European Illuminati
by Vernon L. Stauffer Ph.D.

CHAPTER III
THE EUROPEAN ORDER OF THE ILLUMINATI
1. THE RISE AND THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THE ORDER
THAT great European movement in the direction of the secularization of thought to which the expressive term, the Aufklädrung or Enlightenment, has been applied, and which reached its apogee in the latter half of the eighteenth century, encountered a stubborn opposition in southern Germany in the electorate of Bavaria. The pivot of Bavarian politics, particularly from the beginning of the sixteenth century, had been the alliance which had been effected between the clerical party and the civil power. The counter reformation which followed in the wake of the Lutheran movement was able to claim the field in Bavaria without the necessity of a combat.
In the third quarter of the eighteenth century Bavaria was a land where sacerdotalism reigned supreme. Religious houses flourished in abundance; the number of priests and nuns was incredibly large.1. So easy were the ways of life in that fertile country that a lack of seriousness and intensity of feeling among the masses flung open the door for superstitious practices which made the popular religion little better than gross fetichism. So-called "miraculous" images were commonly paraded through the streets; innumerable statues and sacred relics were exposed to the gaze of crowds of the faithful; the patronage of the saints was assiduously solicited. Among the educated there was a widespread conviction that the piety of the people was ignorant and that their trustful attitude made them the prey of many impostors.
The degree of power to which the representatives of the Society of Jesus had been able to attain in Bavaria was all but absolute.2. Members of the order were the confessors and preceptors of the electors; hence they had a direct influence upon the policies of government. The censorship of religion had fallen into their eager hands, to the extent that some of the parishes even were compelled to recognize their authority and power. To exterminate all Protestant influence and to render the Catholic establishment complete, they had taken possession of the instruments of public education. It was by Jesuits that the majority of the Bavarian colleges were founded, and by them they were controlled. By them also the secondary schools of the country were conducted. 3.
The prevailing type of education in Bavaria had little more to commend it than the popular type of religion.4. The pedagogical aim of the Jesuits was the development of the memory with scant regard for other faculties of the mind. To learn the catechism, or in the case of advanced pupils to receive unquestioningly the dogmatic instruction offered by clerical pedagogues, was the ideal honored throughout the Bavarian schools. Books which bore the slightest taint of Protestant influence, or which in any other way gave evidence of a liberalizing spirit, were ruthlessly banned.5.
Such were the conditions of life under which the great mass of the people lived. There was, however, a relatively small group of cultivated people in Bavaria who, despite the clerical oppression and bigotry from which they suffered, had contrived to share in the liberalizing spirit of the larger world. The censorship exerted by the Jesuits had found no adequate means to guard against the broadening influences of travel or of contact with travelers from other lands, or even to prevent the introduction of all contraband journals and books. The effect of the former had been to create a humiliating and galling sense of inferiority on the part of liberal-minded Bavarians, 6. while the latter had served to stimulate a thirst for the new knowledge which the rationalism of the age made available. To this small group of discontented and ambitious spirits the ancient faith had ceased to be satisfactory, and the burden of clericalism had become insufferable.
The University of Ingolstadt, established in 1472, was destined to become a rallying point for these radical tendencies. In the middle of the sixteenth century the Jesuits had gained control of its faculties of philosophy and theology, and for two centuries thereafter the university had been counted upon as the chief fortress of clericalism in Bavaria.7. By the middle of the eighteenth century the deadening effect of the rigorous censorship exerted by the Jesuits had produced its full fruitage at Ingolstadt. The university had fallen into a state of profound decadence.8.
With the accession of Maximilian Joseph9. as elector, in 1745, the breath of a new life soon stirred within its walls. For the position of curator of the university the elector named a well-known and resolute radical of the day, Baron Johann Adam Ickstatt, and charged him with the responsibility of reorganizing the institution upon a more liberal basis.10. Measures were adopted promptly by the latter looking to the restoration of the prestige of the university through the modernization of its life. The ban was lifted from books whose admission to the library had long been prohibited, chairs of public law and political economy were established, and recruits to the faculty were sought in other universities.11.
It was, of course, not to be expected that the clerical party, whose power in the university, as has been intimated, was particularly well entrenched in the faculties of philosophy and theology, would retire from the field without a struggle.12. A sharp contest arose over the introduction of non-Catholic books, into which the elector himself was drawn, and which in addition to the substantial victory that Ickstatt won, had the further effect of aligning the two parties in the university squarely against each other.13. It was only a few years after this episode, when the Jesuits were still chafing under the sharp setback which their policies had suffered, that the name of Adam Weishaupt first appeared (in 1772) on the roll of the faculty of the university as professor extraordinary of law.
Weishaupt (born February 6, 1748; died November 18, 1830) entered upon his professional career at Ingolstadt after an educational experience which had made him a passionate enemy of clericalism. His father having died when the son was only seven, his godfather, none other than Baron Ickstatt, compelled doubtless by the necessities of the case, had turned the early training of the boy over to the Jesuits. The cramming process through which he thus passed was destined to prove unusually baneful in his case14. on account of certain influences which penetrated his life from another quarter. Accorded free range in the private library of his godfather, the boy’s questioning spirit was deeply impressed by the brilliant though pretentious works of the French "philosophers" with which the shelves were plentifully stocked.15. Here was food for the fires of imagination just beginning to flame up in this unsophisticated and pedantic youth. Here, also, were ready solvents for the doubts with which his experience with Jesuit teachers had filled his m1nd. The enthusiasm of the most susceptible of neophytes seized him: he would make proselytes, he would deliver others from their bondage to outworn beliefs, he would make it his duty to rescue men from the errors into which the race had long been plunged.16. His object in life thus early determined, he threw himself with great zeal into the study of law, economics, politics, history, and philosophy. He devoured every book which chanced to fall into his hands.17.
After graduating from the University of Ingolstadt in 1768, he served for four years in the capacity of tutor and catechist until his elevation to the rank of assistant instructor took place. The favor he was permitted to enjoy as the protegé of Ickstatt 18. brought him more rapid advancement than that to which his native abilities entitled him. In 1773 he was called to the chair of canon law, which for a period of ninety years had been held by representatives of the Jesuits.19. Two years later, when he was but twenty-seven years of age, he was made dean of the faculty of law. Such a rapid improvement in his professional standing proved far from salutary. The young man’s vanity was immensely flattered and his reforming resolution unduly encouraged. His sense of personal worth as the leader of the liberal cause in the university quite outran his merit.20.
Meantime the Jesuits, observing with deep resentment Weishaupt’s meteoric rise,21. together with a growing disposition on his part to voice unrestrained criticism of ecclesiastical intolerance and bigotry, entered into intrigues to checkmate his influence and undermine his position.22. The payment of his salary was protested and the notion that he was a dangerous free-thinker industriously disseminated.23. On his part, Weishaupt did not scruple to furnish Ickstatt’s successor, Lori, with secret reports calculated to put the Jesuit professors in the university in an unfavorable light.24. A disagreeable squabble resulted, marked on the one hand by clerical jealousy and pettiness and on the other by Weishaupt’s imprudence of speech25. and indifference to considerations of professional honor.
The effect of this unseemly strife upon Weishaupt was to establish firmly in his mind the conviction that as the university’s most influential leader against the cause of ecclesiastical obscurantism he was being made a martyr for free speech.26. In no way disposed to be sacrificed to the animosity of enemies whose power he greatly overestimated, he arrived at the conclusion that a general offensive against the clerical party ought immediately to be undertaken. A secret association was needed which, growing more and more powerful through the increase of its members and their progress in enlightenment, should be able to outwit the manoeuvres of the enemies of reason not only in Ingolstadt but throughout the world. Only by a secret coalition of the friends of liberal thought and progress could the forces of superstition and error be overwhelmed. Over the scheme of such an association consecrated to the cause of truth and reason, the self-esteem of Weishaupt kindled anew as he contemplated none other than himself at its head.27.
His imagination having taken heat from his reflections upon the attractive power of the Eleusinian mysteries and the influence exerted by the secret cult of the Pythagoreans, it was first in Weishaupt’s thought to seek in the Masonic institutions of the day the opportunity he coveted for the propagation of his views. From this, original intention, however, he was soon diverted, in part because of the difficulty he experienced in commanding sufficient funds to gain admission to a lodge of Masons, in part because his study of such Masonic books as came into his hands persuaded him that the "mysteries" of Freemasonry were too puerile and too readily accessible to the general public to make them worthwhile.28. He deemed it necessary, therefore, to launch out on independent lines. He would form a model secret organization, comprising "schools of wisdom," concealed from the gaze of the world behind walls of seclusion and mystery, wherein those truths which the folly and egotism of the priests banned from the public chairs of education might be taught with perfect freedom to susceptible youths.29. By the constitution of an order whose chief function should be that of teaching, an instrument would be at hand for attaining the goal of human progress, the perfection of morals and the felicity of the race.30.
On May 1, 1776, the new organization was founded, under the name of the Order of the Illuminati,31. with a membership of five all told. The extremely modest beginning of the order in respect to its original membership was more than matched by the confusion which existed in Weishaupt’s mind as to the precise form which the organization had best take. Only three elementary grades, or ranks, had been worked out by him, and these only in a crude and bungling fashion, when the enterprise was launched. A feverish regard for action had full possession of the founder of the order; the working-out of his hazy ideas of organization might wait for quieter days.32.
Out of the, voluminous and rambling expositions which Weishaupt at various times made of the three primary grades, viz., Novice, Minerval, and Illuminated Minerval, the following brief descriptions are extracted.
To the grade of Novice youths of promise were to be admitted, particularly those who were rich, eager to learn, virtuous, and docile, though firm and persevering.33. Such were to be enrolled only after their imaginations and desires had been artfully aroused by suggestions concerning the advantages to be derived from secret associations among likeminded men, the superiority of the social state over that of nature, the dependence of all governments upon the consent of the governed, and the delight of knowing and directing men.34. Once enrolled, the instruction of each Novice was to be in the hands of his enroller, who kept well hidden from his pupil the identity of the rest of his superiors. Such statutes of the order as he was permitted to read impressed upon the mind of the Novice that the particular ends sought in his novitiate were to ameliorate and perfect his moral character, expand his principles of humanity and sociability, and solicit his interest in the laudable objects of thwarting the schemes of evil men, assisting oppressed virtue, and helping men of merit to find suitable places in the world.35. Having had impressed upon him the necessity of maintaining inviolable secrecy respecting the affairs of the order, the further duties of subordinating his egoistic views annd interests and of according respectful and complete obedience to his superiors were next enjoined. An important part of the responsibility of the Novice consisted in the drawing-up of a detailed report (for the archives of the order), containing complete, information connerning his family and his personal career, covering such remote items as the titles of the books he possessed, the names of his personal enemies and the occasion of their enmity, his own strong and weak points of character, the dominant passions of his parents, the names of their parents and intimates, etc.36. Monthly reports were also required, covering the benefits the recruit had received from and the services he had rendered to the order.37. For the building-up of the order the Novice must undertake his share in the work of recruitment, his personal advancement to the higher grades being conditioned upon the success of such efforts.38. To those whom he enrolled he became in turn a superior; and thus after a novitiate presumably two years in length,39. the way was open for his promotion to the next higher grade.
The ceremony of initiation through which the Novice passed into the grade Minerval was expected to disabuse the mind of the candidate of any lingering suspicion that the order had as its supreme object the subjugation of the rich and powerful, or the, overthrow of civil and ecclesiastical government.40. It also pledged the candidate to be useful to humanity; to maintain a silence eternal, a fidelity inviolable, and an obedience implicit with respect to all the superiors and rules of the order; and to sacrifice all personal interests to those of the society.41. Admitted to the rank of Minerval, the candidate received into his hands the printed statutes of the order, wherein he learned that in addition to the duties he had performed as novice, his obligations had been extended with special reference to his studies.42. These were to be more highly specialized, and the fruits of his researches from time to time turned over to the superiors. In the prosecution of difficult labors of this character, he was to be free to call to his assistance other Minervals in his district,43. He might also count upon the assistance of his superiors in the form of letters of recommendation in case he undertook travels in the pursuit of his studies; and should he form the resolve to publish his material, the order pledged itself to protect him against the rapacity of booksellers who might show themselves disposed to overcharge him for the works he wished to consult, as well as to render assistance in attracting the attention of the public to his work.44.
In the assemblies of this grade the Minerval for the first time came into contact with the members of the order. In other words, his life within the society actually began.45. The thirst for the sense of secret association with men like interests and aims, which the member’s long novitia had developed, began to find its satisfaction.46. Ordinary Minervals and "illuminated" Minervals mingled together in these assemblies 47. and mutually devoted their deliberations to the affairs of the order.
To the grade Illuminated Minerval were admitted those Minervals who in the judgment of their superiors were worthy of advancement. Elaborate initiatory ceremonies fixed in the candidate’s mind the notions that the progressive purification of his life was to be expected as he worked his way upward in the order,48. and that the mastery of the art of directing men was to be his special pursuit as long as he remained in the new grade. To accomplish the latter, i.e., to become an expert psychologist and director of men’s consciences, he must observe and study constantly the actions, purposes, desires, faults, and virtues of the little group of Minervals who were placed under his personal direction and care.49. For his guidance in this difficult task a complicated mass of instructions was furnished him50.
In addition to their continued presence in the assemblies of the Minervals, the members of this grade came together once a month by themselves, to hear reports concerning their disciples, to discuss methods of accomplishing the best results in their work of direction and to solicit each other’s counsel in difficult and embarrassing cases.51. In these meetings the records of the assemblies of the Minervals were reviewed and rectified and afterwards transmitted to the superior officers of the order.
Such, in brief, was the system of the Illuminati as it came from the brain of Weishaupt, its founder. By means of such an organization he proposed to effect nothing less than the redemption of the world. In its assmnblies the truths of human equality and fraternity were to be taught and practised.52. Its members were to be trained to labor for the welfare of the race; to strive for a civilization, not like that of the present, which left men savage and ferocious under its thin veneer, but one which would so radically change their moral dispositions as to put all their desires under the control of reason—the supreme end of life, which neither civil nor religious institutions had been able to secure.53. The study of man was to be made at once so minute, so comprehensive, and so complete 54. that two immense advantages would result: first, the acquisition of the art of influencing favorably the wills of one’s fellows, thus making social reformation possible; and second, self-knowledge.55. Then is to say, the thorough scrutiny of the instincts, passions, thoughts, and prejudices of others, which the order imposed upon him, would react in turn upon the member’s judgment of his own personal life. As a result his conscience would be subjected to frequent examination, and the faults of his life might be expected to yield to correction. From both of these advantages, working together, a moral transformation of the whole of society would result, thus securing the state of universal well-being.56.
But this conception of the order as essentially an instrument of social education requires to be balanced by another, viz., its anticlericalism. Its founder professed that at the time when the idea of the order was taking shape in his mind he was profoundly influenced by the persecutions which honest men of unorthodox sentiments had been compelled to suffer on account of their views.57. Considerations growing out of his own personal embarrassments and imagined peril on account of his clashings with the Jesuits were also admittedly weighty in his thought.58. It is therefore to be regarded as a substantial element in his purpose to forge a weapon against the Jesuits, and in a larger sense to create a league defensive and offensive against all the enemies of free thought.59.
Accordingly, the expression of utterances hostile to Christian dogmas was early heard within the assemblies of the order60. and only the difficulty experienced in working out the supreme grade of the order inhibited Weishaupt’s intention of converting it into a council of war to circumvent and overwhelm the advocates of supernaturalism and the enemies of reason.61. The pure religion of Christ, which, doctrinally conceived, had degenerated into asceticism and, from the institutional standpoint,62. had become a school of fanaticism and intolerance, was pronounced a doctrine of reason, converted into a religion for no other purpose than to make it more efficacious.63. To love God and one’s neighbor was to follow in the way of redemption which Jesus of Nazareth, the grand master of the Illuminati, marked out as constituting the sole road which leads to liberty.64.
The objects of the order were such as to appeal to the discontented elements in a country suffering from intellectual stagnation due to ecclesiastical domination.65. Despite this fact, its growth during the first four years of its existence was anything but rapid. By that time four centers of activity, in addition to Ingolstadt, had been established, and a total of possibly sixty members recruited.66. While its visionary founder considered that a solid basis for encouragernent had been laid 67. as a matter of fact at the termination of the period just indicated the organization was seriously threatened with failure. Fundamental weaknesses had developed from within. Chief among these was the tension which existed almost from the first between Weishaupt and the men whom he associated with him in the supreme direction of the affairs of the order.68. The thirst for domination, which was native to the soul of Weishaupt, converted the order into a despotism against which men who had been taught by their leader that they shared with him the innermost secrets of the organization, rebelled. The result was the constant breaking-out of a spirit of insubordination and a series of quarrels between the founder and his associates which rendered the future progress of the order very precarious.69. The extreme poverty of the organization constituted another serious obstacle to its rapid growth. With a view to demonstrating the genuine disinterestedness of the society, an effort had been made from the beginning to emphasize the financial interests of the order as little as possible.70. The rules of the organization were far from burdensome in this regard, and it is by no means surprising that many of the proposed measures of the leaders in the interests of a more extensive and effective propaganda proved abortive for the very practical reason that funds were not available to carry them into effect.71.
A decidedly new turn in the wheel of fortune came some time within the compass of the year 1780,72. with the enrollment of Baron Adolf Franz Friederich Knigge73. as a member. In the recruiting of this prominent North German diplomat Weishaupt and his associates found the resourceful and influential ally for which the organization had Waited, a man endowed with a genius for organization and so widely and favorably connected that the order was able to reap an immense advantage from the prestige whicln his membership bestowed upon it. Two weighty consequences promptly followed as the result of Kinigge’s advent into the order. The long-sought higher grades were worked out, and an alliance between the Illumiiiati and Freemasonry was effected.74.
Such was the confidence which Knigge’s presence immediately inspired in Weishaupt and his associates that they hailed with enthusiasm his admission to the order, and gladly abandoned to him the task of perfecting the system, their own impotence for which they had been forced to admit.75. Manifesting a zeal and competency which fully justified the high regard of his brethren, Knigge threw himself into the task of elaborating and rendering compact and coherent the childish ideas of organization which Weishaupt had evolved.
The general plan of the order was so shaped as to throw the various grades or ranks into three principal classes.76. To the first class were to belong the grades Minerval and Illuminatus Minor; to the second 77. ( i ) the usual three first grades of Masonry, Apprentice, Fellow, and Master, (2) Illuminatus. Major, and (3) Illuminatus Dirigens, or Scottish Knight; and to the third class were reserved the Higher Mysteries, including (a) the Lesser Mysteries, made up of the ranks of Priest and Prince, and (b) the Greater Mysteries, comprising the ranks of Magus and King.78.
A detailed description of the various grades of Knigge’s system would far outrun the reader’s interest and patience.79. The present writer therefore will content himself with making such comments as seem best suited to supply a general idea of the revised system.
The grade Novice (a part of the system only in a preparatory sense) was left unchanged by Knigge, save for the addition of a printed communication to be put into the hands of all new recruits, advising them that the Order of the Illuminati stands over against all other forms of contemporary Freemasonry as the one type not degenerate, and as such alone able to restore the craft to its ancient splendor.80. The grade Minerval was reproduced as respects its statutes but greatly elaborated in its ceremonies under the influence of Masonic usages with which Knigge was familiar.81. The grade Illuminatus Minor was likewise left identical with Weishaupt’s redaction, save in unimportant particulars as to special duties and in the working-out and explanation of its symbolism.82.
The three symbolic grades of the second class seem to have been devised solely for the purpose of supplying an avenue whereby members of the various branches of the great Masonic family could pass to the higher grades of the new order.83. Membership in these grades was regarded as a mere formality, the peculiar objects and secrets of the order having, of course, to be apprehended later.
A candidate for admission to the grade of Illuminatus Major was first to be subjected to a rigorous examination as respects his connections with other secret organizations and his objects in seeking advancement. His superior, being satisfied upon these points, it was provided that he should be admitted to the grade by means of a ceremonial highly Masonic in its coloring. His special duties were four in number: (1) to prepare a detailed analysis of his character, according to specific instructions furnished him; (2) to assist in the training of those members of the order who were charged with the responsibility of recruiting new members; (3) to put his talents and his social position under tribute for the benefit of the order, either by himself stepping into places of honor which were open or by nominating for such places other members who were fitted to fill them; and (4) to coöperate with other members of his rank in the direction of the assemblies of the, Minervals.84.
Advanced to the grade of Illuminatus Dirigens, or Scottish Knight, the member bound himself with a written oath to withhold his support from every other system of Masonry, or from any other secret society, and to put all his talents and powers at the disposition of the order.85. His obligations in this rank were purely administrative in their character. The inferior grades of the order were territorially grouped together into prefectures, and upon these the authority of the Illuminatus Dirigens was imposed. Each Illuminatus Dirigens had a certain number of Minerval assemblies and lodges assigned to him, and for the welfare of these he was responsible to the superiors of the order. The members of this grade constituted the "Sacred Secret Chapter of the Scottish Knights," from which issued the patents of constitution for the organization of new lodges.86.
To the first grade of the third class, that of Priest,87. were admitted only such members as, in the grade Minerval, had given proof of their zeal and advancement in the particular sciences which they had chosen.88. The initiatory ceremonies of the grade emphasized the wholly unsatisfactory character of existing political and religious systems and sounded the candidate’s readiness to serve the order in its efforts to lead the race away from the vain inventions of civil constitutions and religious dogmas from which it suffered.89. Relieved entirely of administrative responsibilities, the members of this grade devoted themselves exclusively to the instruction of their subordinates in the following branches of science: physics, medicine, mathematics, natural history, political science, the arts and crafts, and the occult sciences. In brief, the final supervision of the teaching function of the order was in their hands, subject only to the ultimate authority of their supreme heads,90.
Knigge’s statutes provided that only a very small number of members were to be admitted to the grade of Prince91. From this group the highest functionaries of the order were to be drawn: National Inspectors, Provincials,92. Prefects, and Deans of the Priests. Over them, in turn, at the apex of the system and as sovereign heads of the order, ruled the Areopagites.93.
So much for the external structure of the system which Knigge reshaped. With respect to the aims and principles of the order the modifications introduced by him were considerable, although scarcely as comprehensive as in the former case. 94. In certain instances the ideas of Weishaupt were retained and developed;95. in others significant alterations were made or new ideas introduced. Of the new ideas the two following were unquestionably of greatest weight: 96. the notion of restricting the field of recruiting solely to the young was abandoned, and this phase of the propaganda was widened so as to include men of experience whose wisdom and influence might be counted upon to assist in attaining the objects of the order; 97. the policy was adopted that henceforth the order should not occupy itself with campaigns against particular political and religious systems, but that its energies should be exerted against superstition, despotism, and tyranny.98. In other words, the battle for tolerance and enlightenment should be waged along universal and not local lines. Accordingly, the esoteric teaching of the order, under Knigge’s revision, was reserved to the higher grades.
The progress of the order from 1780 on 99. was so rapid as to raise greatly the spirits of its leaders. The new method of spreading Illuminism by means of its affiliation with Masonic lodges promptly demonstrated its worth. Largely because of the fine strategy of seeking its recruits among the officers and other influential personages in the lodges of Freemasonry, one after another of the latter in quick succession went over to the new system. 100. New prefectures were established, new provinces organized, and Provincials began to report a steady and copious stream of new recruits. 101. From Bavaria into the upper and lower Rhenish provinces the order spread inito Suabia. Franconia., Westphalia, Upper and Lower Saxony, and outside of Germany into Austria ' and Switzerland. Within a few months after Knigge rescued the order from the moribund condition in which he found it, the leaders were able to rejoice in the accession of three hundred members, many of whom by their membership immensely enhanced the prestige of the order. Students, merchants, doctors, pharmacists, lawyers, judges, professors in gymnasia and universities, preceptors, civil officers, pastors, priests — all were generously represented among the new recruits. 102. Distinguished names soon appeared upon the rosters of the lodges of the new system. Duke Ferdinand of Brunswick, Duke Ernst of Gotha, Duke Karl August of Saxe-Weimar, Prince August of Saxe-Gotha, Prince Carl of Hesse, Baron Dalberg, 103. the philosopher Herder, the poet Goethe, 104. the educationist Pestalozzi, 105. were among the number enrolled, By the end of 1784 the leaders boasted of a total enrollment of between two and three thousand members 106. and the establishment of the order upon a solid foundation seemed to be fully assured. 107.
But just at the moment when the prospects were brightest, the knell of doom suddenly sounded. 108. Dangers from within and from without, with bewildering celerity and concurrence, like a besom of destruction swept from the earth the order which Adam Weishaupt, with such exaggerated anticipations, had constituted out of a little group of obscure students at Ingolstadt, on May Day, 1776.
The internal difficulties were of the nature of dissensions among the chiefs. The old jealousies that existed between Weishaupt and the Areopagites 109. before Knigge, reconstructed the order were not eradicated by the introduction of the new system, and in course of time they flamed forth anew. 110. But ugly in temper and subversive of discipline and order as these petty contentions were, they were of little importance as compared with the fatal discord which arose between Weishaupt and Knigge. The spirit of humility that the former manifested in 1780, when in desperation he turned to Knigge for assistance, did not long continue. Aroused by the danger of seeing his personal control of the order set aside and himself treated as a negligible factor, Weishaupt sought opportunities of asserting his prerogatives, and the ambition of Knigge being scarcely less selfish than that of Weishaupt, the two men quarreled repeatedly and long. 111. So bitter and implacable the spirit of the two became that in the end, exercising a discretion dictated by despair rather than generosity, Knigge withdrew from the field, leaving Weishaupt in undisputed possession of the coveted headship of the order.
But the fruits of his victory the latter had little chance to enjoy. 112. On June 22, 1784, Carl Theodore 113. launched the first of his edicts against all communities, societies, and brotherhoods in his lands which had been established without due authorization of law and the confirmation of the sovereign. 114. The edict, to be sure, was general in its character, and the Bavarian Illuminati were glad to believe that their system was not specially involved: by lying low for a season the squall would speedily blow over and the activities of the order might safely be resumed 115. These anticipations, however, were doomed to disappointment. Having surrendered himself completely to. the spirit of reaction, and spurred by reports of the covert disobedience of the order which his entourage spread before him, 116. the Bavarian monarch, on March 2 of the following year, issued another edict that specifically designated the Illuminati as one of the branches of Freemasonry, all of which were severely upbraided for their failure to yield implicit obedience to the will of the sovereign as expressed in the previous edict, and a new ban, more definite and sweeping in its terms than the former, was thereby proclaimed. 117.
A fixed resolution on the part of the government to give full force to the provisions of the interdict left no room for evasion. 118. In response to the call of its enemies, former members of the order who, either because of scruples of conscience or for less honorable reasons, had withdrawn from its fellowship, came forward to make formal declarations respecting their knowledge of its affairs. 119. In this direct manner the weapons needed for the waging of an effective campaign against the society were put into the government’s hands. 120. Judicial inquiries were inaugurated, beginning at Ingolstadt. 121. Measures of government, all aimed at nothing short of the complete suppression and annihilation of the order, followed one another in rapid succession. Officers and soldiers in the army were required to come forward and confess their relations with the Illuminati, under promise of immunity if ready and hearty in their response, but under pain of disgrace, cassation, or other punishment if refractory. 122. Members and officers of consular boards were subjected to similar regulations, 123. Officers of state and holders of ecclesiastical benefices who were found to have connections with the order were summarily dismissed from their posts. 124. Professors in universities and teachers in the public schools suffered a like fate. 125. Students who were recognized as adepts were dismissed, and in some cases were banished from the country. 126.
As a system the order was shattered but its supporters were not wholly silenced, Weishaupt particularly, from his place of security in a neighboring country, lifted his voice against the men who had betrayed the order and the government which had ruined it. Taking recourse to his pen, with incredible rapidity he struck off one pamphlet and volume after another,127. in a feverish effort, offensive and defensive, to avert if possible total disaster to the cause which, despite all his frailties, he truly loved. The one clear result of his polemical efforts was to draw the fire of those who defended the denunciators of the afflicted order and who supported the clerical party and the government. A war of pamphlets developed, the noise and vehemence of which were destined to add, if possible, to the embarrassment and pain of those members of the order who still remained in Bavaria. Once more the suspicions of the government were aroused; a search was made by the police for further evidence, and in the month of October, 1786, at Landshut, in the house of Xavier Zwack, 128. one of the order’s most prominent leaders, decisive results were achieved. A considerable number of books and papers were discovered,129. the latter containing more than two hundred letters that had passed between Weishaupt and the Areopagites, dealing with the most intimate affairs of the order, together with tables containing the secret symbols, calendar, and geographical terms belonging to the system, imprints of its insignia, a partial roster of its membership, the statutes, instruction for recruiters, the primary ceremony of initiation, etc.130.
Here was the complete range of evidence the authorities had long waited for. Out of the mouths of its friends, the accusations which its enemies made against the order were to be substantiated. By the admissions of its leaders, the system of the Illuminati had the appearance of an organization devoted to the overthrow of religion and the state, a band of poisoners and forgers, an association of men of disgusting morals and depraved tastes The publication of these documents amounted to nothing less than a sensation.131. New measures were forthwith adopted by the government. Leading representatives of the order, whose names appeared in the telltale documents, were placed under arrest and formally interrogated, Some of these, like the treasurer, Hertel, met the situation with courage and dignity, and escaped with no further punishment than a warning to have nothing to do with the organization in the future under fear of graver consequences. 132. Others, like the poltroon Mändl,133. adopted the course of making monstrous "revelations" concerning the objects and practices of the order. Still others, like Massenhausen, against whom the charge of poison-mixing was specifically lodged,134. sought safety in flight.
As a final blow against the devastated order, on August 16, 1787, the duke of Bavaria launched his third and last edict against the system.135. The presentments of the former interdicts were reëmphasized, and in addition, to give maximum force to the sovereign’s will, criminal process, without distinction of person, dignity, state, or quality, was ordered against any Illuminatus who should be discovered continuing the work of recruiting. Any so charged and found guilty were to be deprived of their lives by the sword; while those thus recruited were to have their goods confiscated and themselves to be condemned to perpetual banishment from the territories of the duke.136. Under the same penalties of confiscation and banishment, the members of the order, no matter under what name or circumstances, regular or irregular, they should gather, were forbidden to assemble as lodges.137.
The end of the order was at hand. So far as the situation within Bavaria was concerned, the sun of the Illuminati had already set.138. It remained for the government to stretch forth its hand as far as possible, to deal with those fugitives who, enjoying the protection of other governments, might plot and contrive to rebuild the ruined system. Accordingly, Zwack, who had sought asylum first in the court of Zweibrücken and had later obtained official position in the principality of Salm-Kyburg, was summoned by the duke of Bavaria to return to that country. The summons was not accepted,139. but the activities of Zwack as a member of the Illuminati, as the event proved, were over. Count (Baron) Montgelas, whose services on behalf of the order do not appear to have been significant, but who, upon the publication of the correspondence seized in the residence of Zwack, had likewise sought the protection of the duke of Zweibrücken, found the favor of that sovereign sufficient to save him from the power of the Bavarian monarch.140. As for Weishaupt, whose originary relation to the order the Bavarian government had discovered in the secret correspondence just referred to, his presence in Gotha, outside Bavarian territory but in close proximity to the Bavarian possessions, added greatly to the concern of Carl Theodore.141. Efforts were made by the latter to counteract any influence he might exert to rehabilitate the Illuminati system.142. They were as futile as they were unnecessary. Broken in spirit, making no effort to regain the kingdom which his vanity insisted he had lost, contenting himself with the publication of various apologetic writings,143. permitted for a considerable period to enjoy the bounty of his generous patron, Duke Ernst of Gotha, he sank slowly into obscurity.144.
As for the fortunes of the order outside of Bavaria, the measures adopted by the government of that country proved decisive. Here and there, especially in the case of Bode,145. a Saxon Illuminatus, efforts were made to galvanize the expiring spirit of the order, but wholly without result.
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE: The amount of literature, chiefly polemical in character, which has sprung up about the subject of the European Illuminati is astonishingly large. Wolfstieg, Bibliographie der Freimaurerischen Literatur, vol. ii, pp. 971-979, lists ninety-six separate titles of principal works, not counting translations, new editions, etc, In the same volume (pp. 979-982) he lists the titles of one hundred and fourteen "kleinere Schriften". In addition, he also lists (Ibid., p. 982) three titles of books occupied with the statutes of the order, and the titles of five principal works devoted to the order’s ritual ( p. 983), together with the titles of nine smaller works likewise occupied (ibid.). No student penetrates far into the study of the general topic without being made aware that not only were contemporary apologists and hostile critics stirred to a fierce heat of literary expression, but that a swarm of historians, mostly of inferior talents, have been attracted to the subject.
In view of the thoroughgoing work which bibliographers like Wolfstieg have performed, no necessity arises to repeat the task. For the benefit of the student who may wish to acquant himself at first hand with the principal sources of information respecting the order, the titles are grouped in three principal divisions.
I. Apologetic writings.
Weishaupt,Apologie der Illuminaen, Frankfort and Leipzig, 1786.
"Vollstständige Geschichte der Verfolgung der Illuminaten in Bayern, I, Frankfort and Leipzig, 1786.
"Das verbesserte System der Illuminaten mit allen seinen Graden und Einrichtungen, Frankfort and Leipzig, 1787.
"Kurze Rechtfertigung meiner Absichten, Frankfort and Leipzig, 1787.
"Nachtrag zur Rechfertigung meiner Absichten, Frankfort and Leipzig, 1787.
Bassus,Vorstellung denen hohen Standeshäuptern der Erlauchten Republik Graubünden, Nuremberg, 1788.
Knigge,Philo’s endliche Erklärung und Antwort auf verschiedene Anforderungen und Fragen, Hanover, 1788.
II. Documents of the order, published by the Bavarian government or otherwise, and hostile polemics.
Einige Originalschriften des Illuminaten Ordens, Munich, 1787.
Nachtrag von weiteren Originalschriften, Munich, 1787
Der ächte Illuminat, oder die whren, unverbesserten Rituale der Illuminaten, Edessa (Frankfort-on-the-Main), 1788
Cosandey, Renner, and Grünberger, Drei merkwürdige Aussagen die innere Einrichtung des Illuminatenordens, Munich, 1786
Same (with Utzschneider), Grosse Absichten des Ordens der Illuminaten mit Nachtrag, I, II, III, Munich, 1786.
Der neuesten Arbeiten des Sparticus und Philo, Munich, 1793.
Illuminatus Dirigens, oder Schottischer Ritter. Ein Pendant, etc., Munich, 1794.
III. Historical treatments of the precise character and significance of the order.
Mounier, De l'influence attribuée aux philosophes, aux francmaçons et aux illuminés, sur la révolution de France, Tübingen, 1801.
Mounier, J.J., On the Influence attribiuted to Philosophers, Freemasons, and to the Illuminati, on the Revolution of France.... Translated from the Manuscript, and corrected under the inspection of the author, by J. Walker, London, 1801.
Engel, Gerschichte des Illuminaten-Ordens, Berlin, 106.
Forestier, Les Illuminés de Bavière et la Franc-Maçonnerie allemonde, Paris, 1915.
2.THE LEGEND OF THE ORDER AND ITS LITERARY COMMUNICATION TO NEW ENGLAND
Although the Order of the Illuminati was dead, the world had yet to reckon with its specter. So intense and widespread was the fear which the order engendered, so clearly did the traditionalists of the age see in its clientele the welding together into a secret machine of war of the most mischievous and dangerous of these elements which were discontented with the prevailing establishments of religion and civil government, that it was impossible that its shadow should pass immediately.146.
The emergence of the order had attracted public attention so abruptly and sharply, and its downfall had been so violent and so swift, that public opinion lacked time to adjust itself to the facts in the case. In Bavaria, particularly, the enemies of the order were unable to persuade themselves that the machinations of the Illuminati could safely be regarded as wholly of the past.147. The documents of the order were appealed to, to supply proof that its leaders had made deliberate calculations against the day of possible opposition and temporary disaster and with satanic cunning had made their preparations to wring victory out of apparent defeat.148. Besides, the depth of the government’s suspicions and hostility was such that additional, though needless measures of state149. kept very much alive in that country the haunting fear of the continued existence of the order.
Outside of Bavaria numerous factors contributed to create the same general impression in the public mind. Among these were the efforts of the Rosicrucians to play upon the fears that the Illuminati had awakened, the mistaken connections which, in the Protestant world, were commonly made between the members of the Order of the Illuminati and the representatives and promoters of the Aufklärung, and the emergence of the German Union. To each of these in turn a word must be devoted,
Following the suppression of the Jesuits in 1773, members of that order in considerable numbers, attracted by the rapid growth and the pretentious occultism of the Rosicrucians,150. had united with the latter system.151. The result was the infusion of a definite strain of clericalism into the order of the Rosicrucians and, in consequence, a renewal of the attack upon the Illuminati. In Prussia, where the Rosicrucians had firmly established themselves in Berlin, King Frederick William II was under the influence of Wöllner, one of his ministers and a leading figure in the Rosicrucian system.152. Through the latter’s relations with Frank, who at the time stood at the head of the Rosicrucian order in Bavaria, the Prussian monarch was easily persuaded that the operations of the Illuminati had not only been extended to his own territories, but throughout all Germany.153. Encouraged by Wöllner, Frederick William took it upon himself to warn neighboring monarchs respecting the peril which he believed threatened, a course which bore at least one definite result in the measures taken by the elector of Saxony to investigate the situation at Leipzig where, according to the king of Prussia, a meeting of the chiefs of the Illuminati had been effected.154. Thus the notion that the order of the Illuminati was still in existence was accorded the sanction of influential monarchs.
The disposition of orthodox Protestants to confuse the advocates of rationalism with the membership of the Illuminati finds its suggestion of plausibility at a glance and stands in little need of specific historical proof. The general effect of the undermining of traditional faiths, for which the dominating influences of the period of the Aufklärung were responsible, was to create the impression among the more simple-minded and credulous elements in the Protestant world that a vast combination of forces was at work, all hostile to the Christian religion and all striving to supplant faith by reason. So vast and significant a movement of thought naturally enough tended to engender various suspicions, and among these is to be numbered the naïve conviction that the order which the Bavarian government had felt compelled to stamp out, on account of its alleged impiety and its immoral and anarchical principles, was but a local expression of the prevailing opposition to the established systems and orthodox doctrines of the age.155.
The excitement occasioned by the appearance of the German Union (Die Deutshe Union), on account of its defifinit connections with one of the former leaders156. of Weishaupt’s system and the unsavory private character and avowed unscrupulous designs of its originator, gave still more specific force to the Illuminati legend. Charles Frederick Bahrdt,157. a disreputable doctor of theology, in 1787, at Halle, proposed to reap advantage from the ruin of Weishaupt’s, system and to recruit among its former members the supporters of a new league, organized to accomplish the enlightenment of the people principally by means of forming in every city secret associations of men158. who were to keep correspondence with similar groups of their brethren and who, by the employment of reading-rooms, were to familiarize the people with those writings which were specially calculated to remove popular prejudices and superstition and to break the force of appeals to tradition. Further, these associations were to supply financial assistance to writers who enlisted in the Union’s campaign, and to fill the palms of booksellers who for the sake of a bribe, show themselves willing to prevent the sale of the works of authors who withheld their coöperation.159.
As an organization the German Union scarcely emerged from the stage of inception; but the absurd policy of publicity pursued by its founder gave to the project a wide airing and provoked hostile writings160. that added immensely to the importance of the matter. The new system was boldly denounced as continuing the operations of the odious order dissolved in Bavaria, with a shrewd change of tactics which substituted "innocent" reading-rooms for the novitiate of Weishaupt’s organization, and thus, it was urged, the way was opened for the exertion of a really powerful influence upon the thought of the German people.161.
By such means, and in such widely diverse and irrational ways, the popular belief in the survival of the defunct Order of the Illuminati was kept alive and supplied with definite points of attachment; but it remained for the French Revolution, in all the rapidity and vastness of its developments and in the terrifying effects which its more frightful aspects exercised upon its observers, to offer the most exciting suggestions and to stimulate to the freest play the imaginations of those who were already persuaded that the secret associations that plagued Bavaria still lived to trouble the earth,162.
The supposed points of connection between the Order of the Illuminati and the French Revolution were partly tangible, though decidedly elusive,163. but much more largely of the nature of theories framed to meet the necessities of a case which in the judgment of dilettante historians positively required the hypothesis of a diabolical conspiracy against thrones and altars (i.e., the civil power and the church), though the labors of Hercules might have to be exceeded in putting the same to paper.
Of the exiguous resources of interpreters of the Revolution who made serious efforts to trace its impious and anarchical principles and its savage enormities to their lair in the lodges of the Illuminati, the following are perhaps the only ones worthy of note.
The public discussion of the affairs and principles of Weishaupt’s organization, to which attention has already been called in various connections, continued with unabated zeal even beyond the close of the eighteenth century. At the very hour when the Revolution was shocking the world by its lapse from its orignal [sic] self-control into its horrible massacres, exeguticutions of Monarchs, guillotine-lust. and ferocious struggles between parties, new pamphlets and reviews bearing on the demolished order’s constitution and objects found their way into the channels of public communication.
Conspicuous among these were the following: Die neuesten Arbeiten des Spartacus und Philo in dem Illuminaten, Orden, jetzt zum ersten Mal gedruckt und zur Beherzigung bei gegenwärtigen Zeitläuften herausgegeben,164. and Illuminatus Dirigens oder Schottischer Ritter,165. announced as a contintiation of the former. These works, published at the instigation of the authorities at Munich, attracted public attention anew to the most extreme religious and social doctrines166. of the order. Thus the revolutionary character of Illuminism received heavy emphasis167. synchronously with contemporary events of the utmost significance to the imperilled cause of political and religious conservatism.
In Austria an independent literary assault upon Illuminism developed. At Vienna, Leopold Hoffman,168. editor of the Wiener Zeitschrift, fully convinced that the Order of the Illuminati had exercised a baneful effect upon Freemasonry, to which he was devoted, abandoned his chair of language and German literature at the University of Vienna to dedicate his talents and his journal to the overthrow of Illuminated Freemasonry169. Finding a zealous collaborator in a certain Dr. Zimmerman, a physician of Hannover, a radical turned an extreme conservative by the developments of the French Revolution, the two labored energetically to stigmatize the Illuminati as the secret cause of the political explosion in France.
The discontinuance of the Wiener Zeitschrift in 1793 by no means marked the end of the campaign. A deluge of pamphlets170. had been precipitated, all based upon the assumption that the order Weishaupt had founded had subsided only in appearance. Declamation did not wait upon evidence. It was alleged that the lower grades of the Illuminati had been dissolved, but the superior grades were still practised. Under cover of correspondence, recruits of the system were now being sought. Freemasonry was being subjugated by Illuminism only that it might be forced to serve the ends of its conqueror. journalists partial to the interests of the Aufklärung had been enlisted for the same purpose. The German Union was thus only one of the enterprises fostered by the Illuminati to further their designs. The dogmas of the order had been spread secretly in France by means of the clubs of that country, and the effectiveness of the propaganda was being vividly demonstrated in the horrors of the Revolution. Unless German princes should promptly adopt rigorous measures against the various agents and enterprises of the order in their territories, they might confidently expect similar results to follow.171.
Much more of like character was foisted upon the reading public. As for contemporary historians who searched for specific evidence of an alliance between the Illuminati of Germany and the Revolutionists in France, their energies were chiefly employed in the development of a clue which had as its kernel the supposed introduction of Illuminism into France at the hands of the French revolutionary leader, Mirabeau, and the German savant, Bode.172. Unfolded, this view of the case may be stated briefly as follows: Mirabeau, during his residence at Berlin, in the years 1786 and 1787, came into touch with the Illuminati of that city and was received as an adept into the order. Upon his return to Paris he made the attempt to introduce Illuminism into that particular branch of Masonry of which he was also a member, the Philalèthes or Amis Réunis.173. To give force to his purpose, he called upon the Illuminati in Berlin to send to his assistance two talented and influential represensentatives of the order. The men chosen by the Illuminati circle in Berlin, Bode and von dem Busche,174. arrived in Paris in the early summer of 1787. To conceal their purpose from prying eyes, they spread the report that they had come from Germany to investigate the subjects of magnetism and the extent of the influence exerted by the Jesuits upon the secret societies of the age. Meantime, the lodges of the Philalèthes, and through them the French Masonic lodges in general, were innoculated with the principles of llluminism. French Freemasonry thus became committed to the project of forcing the overthrow of thrones and altars. So transformed, these lodges created secret committees who busied themselves with plans for the precipitation of a great revolutionary movement. To these committees belonged the subsequent leaders and heroes of the French Revolution—de Rochefoucauld, Condorcet, Pétion, the Duke of Orléans (Grand Master of French Masonry), Camille-Desmoulins, Danton, Lafayette, de Leutre, Fauchet, et al. Through these and their associates the connection between the lodges of Illuminated French Freemasonry and the powerful political clubs of the country was effected. Thus Illuminism was able to inspire Jacobinism. Finally, on the 14 of July, 1789, the revolutionary mine was sprung, and the great secret of the Illuminati became the possession of the world.175.
At every point this fantastic exposition suffered the fatal defect of a lack of historical proof. Even the specific assertions of its inventors which were most necessary to their hypothesis were disproved by the facts brought to light by more cautious and unbiased investigators who followed. E.g., the idea of Mirabeau’s intimate connection with the program of the Order of the Illuminati and his profound faith in it as the best of all instruments for the work of social amelioration is rendered untenable the moment the rash and unrepublican temper of his spirit is called seriously to mind.176. Again, the real object of Bode’s visit to Paris, a matter of vital importance in the Illuminati-French Revolution hypothesis, was not to communicate Illuminism to French Freemasons, but to attend an assembly of representatives of the Philalèthes, called to consider the results of an inquiry previously undertaken, respecting the occult interests and tendencies of that order. Convinced that that branch of French Masonry was yielding to an inordinate passion for the occult sciences, Bode had been prevailed upon by German Masons, von dem Busche177. among the number, to make a journey to Paris to warn his French brethren of their mistake. A subsidiary personal interest in the newly-discovered "science" of animal magnetism178. helped to form his decision to make the trip.179.
The much more important contention that the Illuminati were instrumental in starting the French Revolution, shows a lack of historical perspective that either leaves out of account or obscures the importance of the economic, social, political, and religious causes, tangible and overt, though complex, that rendered the Revolution inevitable.
Yet the legend of Illuminism as the responsible author of the French Revolution found numerous vindicators and interpreters,180. to the efforts of two of which, because of their intimate relation to the interests of the investigation in hand, our attention in the remainder of this chapter is to be confined.
In the year 1797 there appeared at Edinburgh, Scotland a volume bearing the following title: Proofs of a Conspiracy against All the Religions and Governments of Europe, carried on in the Secret Meetings of the Free Masons, Illuminati, and Reading Societies.181. Its author, John Robison,182. an English savant and Freemason whose position in the academic world entitled his statements to respect, had had his curiosity regarding the character and effects of continental Freemasonry greatly stimulated by a stray volume of the German periodical, Religions Begebenheiten,183. which came under his notice in 1795, and in which he found expositions of Masonic systems and schisms so numerous and so seriously maintained by their advocates as to create deep wonderment in his mind.184. Bent upon discovering both the occasion and the significance of this tangled mass, Robison obtained possession of other volumes of the periodical mentioned185. and set himself the task of elucidating the problem presented by Masonry’s luxuriant growth and its power of popular appeal.
The conclusions Robison came to are best stated in his own words:
I have found that the covert of a Mason Lodge had been employed in every country for venting and propagating sentiments in religion and politics, that could not have circulated in public without exposing the author to great danger. I found, that this impunity had gradually encouraged men of licentious principles to become more bold, and to teach doctrines subversive of all our notions of morality—of all our confidence in the moral government of the universe—of all our hopes of improvement in a future state of existence—and of all satisfaction and contentment with our present life, so long as we live in a state of civil subordination. I have been able to trace these attempts, made, through a course of fifty years, under the specious pretext of enlightening the world by the torch of philosophy, and of dispelling the clouds of civil and religious superstition which keep the nations of Europe in darkness and slavery. I have observed these doctrines gradually diffusing and mixing with all the different systems of Free Masonry; till, at last, AN ASSOCIATION HAS BEEN FORMED for the express purpose of ROOTING OUT ALL THE RELIGIOUS ESTABLISHMENTS, AND OVERTURNING ALL THE EXISTING GOVERNMENTS OF EUROPE. I have seen this Association exerting itself zealously and systematically, till it has become almost irresistible: And I have seen that the most active leaders in the French Revolution were members of this Association, and conducted their first movements according to its principles, and by means of its instructions and assistance, formally requested and obtained: And, lastly, I have seen that this Association still exists, still works in secret, and that not only several appearances among ourselves show that its emissaries are endeavouring to propagate their detestable doctrines, but that the Association has Lodges in Britain corresponding with the mother Lodge at Munich ever since 1784. . . . The Association of which I have been- speaking is the order of ILLUMINATI, founded, in 1775 [sic], by Dr. Adam Weishaupt, professor of Canon-law in the University of Ingolstadt, and abolished in 1786 by the Elector of Bavaria, but revived immediately after, under another name, and in a different form, all over Germany. It was again detected, and seemingly broken up; but it had by this time taken so deep root that it still subsists without being detected, and has spread into all the countries of Europe.186.
The "proofs" to which Robison appealed to support these conclusions betrayed the same lack of critical mind187. with which all the advocates of the Illuminati-French Revolution hypothesis are to be charged. Only the more significant elements are here brought under survey.188.
That inclination for a multiplication of the degrees and an elaboration of the ceremonies of simple English Freemasonry which Robison found operative among French Freemasons from the beginning of the eighteenth century on,189. had resulted in making the lodges attractive to those elements in France whose discontent over civil and ecclesiastical oppressions had grown great.190. Under the pressure imposed upon private and public discussion by the state and by the church, men of letters, avocats au parlement, unbeneficed abbés, impecunious youths, and self-styled philosophers thronged the halls of the lodges, eager to take advantage of the opportunity their secret assemblies afforded to discuss the most intimate concerns of politics and religion.191. Despite the wide contrariety of minor views thus represented, one general idea and language, that of "cosmopolitanism," was made familiar to a multitude of minds. Worse still, the popular interest of the period in mysticism, theosophy, cabala, and genuine science was appealed to, in order to provide a more numerous clientele among whom might be disseminated the doctrines of atheism, materialism, and discontent with civil subordination.192. Thus the Masonic lodges in France were made "the hot-beds, where the seeds were sown, and tenderly reared, of all the pernicious doctrines which soon after choked every moral or religious cultivation, and have made . . . Society worse than a waste ...."193.
The introduction of French Freemasonry into Germany according to Robison, was followed by similar results.194. Thither, as to France, simple English Freemasonry had first gone, and because of its exclusive emphasis upon the principle of brotherly love the Germans had welcomed it and treated it with deep seriousness;195. but the sense of mystery and the taste for ritualistic embellishments which the advent of French Masonry promoted, speedily changed the temper of the German brethren.196. A reckless tendency to, innovation set in. The love of stars and ribbons,197. and the desire to learn of ghost-raising, exorcism, and alchemy,198. became the order of the day. Rosicrucianism flourished,199. rival systems appeared, and questions of precedency split German Freemasonry into numerous fiercely hostile camps.200.
Meantime, on account of the propaganda carried on by the Enlighteners,201. a revolution of the public mind took place in Germany, marked by a great increase of scepticism, infidelity, and irreligion, not only among the wealthy and luxurious but among the profligate elements in the lower classes as well.202. Rationalistic theologians, aided and abetted by booksellers and publishers and by educational theorists,203. coöperated to make the ideas of orthodox Christianity distasteful to the general public.204. To give effect to this campaign of seduction, the lodges of Freemasonry were invaded and their secret assemblies employed to spread free-thinking and cosmopolitical ideas.205. Thus German Freemasonry became impregnated with the impious and revolutionary tendencies of French Freemasonry.206. At such an hour, according to Robison, Weishaupt founded his Order of the Illuminati.207. Employing the opportunities afforded him by his connections with the Masons,208. he exerted himself to make disciples and to lay the foundations of an "Association . . . which, in time, should govern the world," the express aim of which "was to abolish Christianity and overturn all civil government."209.
To accomplish this end a most insinuating pedagogy was adopted,210. the members were trained to spy upon one another,211. and hypocrisy which did not stop short of positive villainy was practised.212. As a fitting climax to a program that involved the complete subversion of existing moral standards, women were to be admitted to the lodges.213.
Following an analysis of the grades of the order,214. lifted little if any above the general plane of ineptitude upon which the author moved, Robison incorporated into his history of the Bavarian Illuminati a table of the lodges that had been established prior to 1786.215. Drawing professedly upon the private papers of the order as published by the Bavarian government, he worked out a list which included five lodges in Strassburg; four in Bonn; fourteen in Austria; "many" in each of the following states, Livonia, Courland, Alsace, Hesse, Poland, Switzerland, and Holland; eight in England; two in Scotland; and "several" in America.216.
The suppression of the Illuminati by the Bavarian government was regarded by Robison as merely "formal" in its nature: 217. the evil genius of the banned order speedily reappeared in the guise of the German Union218. Into the discussion of the German Union Robison read the "proofs" of an enterprise truly gigantic both as to its proportions and its baneful influence. The illuminated lodges of Freemasonry were declared to have given way to reading societies wherein the initiated, i.e., the members of the Union, actively employed themselves, apparently to accomplish the noble ends of enlightening mankind and securing the dethronement of superstition and fanaticism,219. but actually to, secure the destruction of every sentiment of religion, morality and loyalty220. The higher mysteries of Bahrdt’s silly and abortive project were declared to be identical with those of Weishaupt’s order (natural religion and atheism were to be substituted for Christianity, and political principles equally anarchical with those of the Illuminati were fostered)221.
Although Robison confessed himself driven to pronounce Bahrdt’s enterprise "coarse, and palpably mean,"222. and although the archives and officers of the Union were held to be " contemptible,"223. none the less an elaborate though most disjointed tale was unfolded by him. This involved the organization of the German literati and the control of the book trade, with a view to forming taste and directing public opinion;224. and the establishment of reading societies to the number of eight hundred or more,225. among whose members were to be circulated such books as were calculated to fortify the mind against all disposition to be startled on account of the appearance of "doctrines and maxims which are singular, or perhaps opposite to those which are current in ordinary societies."226. Thus it would be possible "to work in silence upon all courts, families, and individuals in every quarter, and acquire an influence in the appointment of court-officers, stewards, secretaries, parish-priests, public teachers, or private tutors."227.
Robison was unable to present anything beyond the most tenuous "proofs" that a direct relation existed between Weishaupt’s system and Bahrdt’s enterprise;228. still he did not hesitate to affirm that, on account of the emergence of the latter, it had been made clear that the suppression of the Illuminati had been futile.229. "Weishaupt and his agents were still busy and successful."230.
Arriving finally at the subject of the French Revolution, Robison devoted something more than sixty pages to an effort to connect the system of Weishaupt with the great European debacle. Approaching the matter with unconcealed dubiety,231. he found his confidence, and boldness growing as he proceeded. Relying chiefly upon such uncritical and promiscuous sources as the Religions Begebenheiten, the Wiener Zeitschrift, and the Magazin des Literatur et Kunst (sic), and a work entitled Memoires Posthumes de, Custime, he sought a point of direct contact between the Illuminati and the French revolutionary movement by stressing the enlistment of Mirabeau,232. the mission of Bode and von Busche,233. and the instructions which, he alleged, were given by the latter to the Amis Réunis and the Philalèthes through their chief lodges at Paris.234.
The mission of Bode and von Busche, according to Robison, had been undertaken at the request of Mirabeau and the Abbé Perigord235. (Talleyrand). When Weishaupt’s plan was thus communicated to the two French lodges mentioned, "they saw at once its importance, in all its branches, such as the use of the Masonic Lodges, to fish for Minervals—the rituals and ranks to entice the young, and to lead them by degrees to opinions, and measures which, at first sight, would have shocked them."236. By the beginning of 1789 the lodges of the Grand Orient237. had received the secrets of the Illuminati.2378. The Duke of Orléans, who, had been "illuminated" by Mirabeau,239. and whose personal political ambitions were strongly stressed by Robison,240. gave hearty support to the enterprise; and thus in a very short time the Masonic lodges of France were converted into a set of secret affiliated societies, all corresponding with the mother lodges of Paris, and ready to rise instantly and overturn the government as soon as the signal should be given.241. The political committees organized in each of these "illuminated" lodges familiarized not only their brethren but, through them, the country in general, with the secret revolutionary program.242. Thus it happened that the "stupid Bavarians" became the instructors of the French in the art of overturning the world";243. and thus, also , it happened that "the whole nation changed, and changed again, and again, as if by beat of drum."244.
Such in its main outlines and in its "principal links" of evidence is the Proofs of a Conspiracy against all the Religions and Governments of Europe. Yet to obtain a just appraisal of the book it must not be overlooked that its author wrote an additional one hundred and fifty pages, not of "proofs" but of argument, partly to defend errors of judgment he may have committed in his treatment of the subject, but chiefly to persuade his fellow countrymen that the principles of Illuminism were false and to urge them to turn a deaf ear to these doctrines.
We turn now to consider another much more elaborate exposition of the Illuminati-French Revolution legend. Almost at the moment of the appearance of Robison’s book, there appeared in French, at London and Hamburg, a far more finished production, devoted to the same thesis and bearing the title, Mémoires pour servir à l'histoire du Jacobinisme.245. Its author, the Abbé Barruel,246. who had been trained as a Jesuit, enjoying literary talents much superior to those of Robison and relying upon documentary evidence more copious if not more convincing, defined his purpose in the following manner:
We shall show that with which it is incumbent on all nations and their chiefs to be acquainted: we shall demonstrate that, even to the most horrid deeds perpetrated during the French Revolution, everything was foreseen and resolved on, was combined and premeditated: that they were the offspring of deep-thought villainy, since they had been prepared and were produced by men, who alone held the clue of those plots and conspiracies, lurking in the secret meetings where they had been conceived, and only watching the favorable moment of bursting forth. Though the events of each day may not appear to have been combined, there nevertheless existed a secret agent and a secret cause, giving rise to each event, and turning each circumstance to the long-sought-for end. Though circumstances may often have afforded the pretense of the occasion, yet the grand cause of the revolution, its leading features, its atrocious crimes, will still remain one continued chain of deep-laid and premeditated villainy.247.
The amazing breadth of Barruel’s canvass, as well as the naiveté of the artist, are immediately disclosed in his foreword respecting the "triple conspiracy" which he proposes to lay bare.248. To present this "triple conspiracy" in his own words will do more than define the abbé’s conception of his task: its transparent incoordination will make it apparent that much of the work of examination that might otherwise seem to be called for is futile.
1st. Many years before the French Revolution, men who styled themselves Philosophers conspired against the God of the Gospel, against Christianity, without distinction of worship, whether Protestant or Catholic, Anglican or Presbyterian. The grand object of this conspiracy was to overturn every alter where Christ was adored. It was the conspiracy of the Sophisters249. of Impiety, or the ANTICHRISTIAN CONSPIRACY.
2dly. This school of impiety soon formed the Sophisters of Rebellion: these latter, combining their conspiracy against kings with that of the Sophisters of Impiety, coalesce with that ancient sect whose tenets constituted the whole secret of the Occult-Lodges of Free-Masonry, which long since, imposing on the credulity of its most distinguished adepts, only initiated the chosen of the elect into the secret of their unrelenting hatred for Christ and kings.
3dly. From the Sophisters of Impiety and Rebellion arose Sophisters of Impiety and Anarchy. These latter conspire not only against Christ and his altars, but against every religion natural or revealed: not only against kings, but against every government, against all civil society, even against prqperty whatsoever.
This third sect, known by the name of Illumines, coalesced with the Sophisters conspiring against Christ, coalesced with the Sophisters who, with the Occult Masons, conspired against both Christ and kings. It was the coalition of the adepts of impiety, of the adepts of rebellion, and the adepts of anarchy, which formed the CLUB of the JACOBINS . . . Such was the origin, such the progress of that sect, since become so dreadfully famous under the name JACOBIN. In the present Memoirs each of these three conspiracies shall be treated separately; their authors unmasked, the object, means, coalition and progress of the adepts shall be laid open.250.
The sole proposition which Barruel proposed to maintain is thus made clear enough. All the developments of the French Revolution were to be explained on the basis of the following postulate: The Encyclopedists, Freemasons, and Bavarian Illuminati, working together, not unconsciously but with well-planned coördination, produced the Jacobins, and the Jacobins in turn produced the Revolution. Over all, embracing all, the word " conspiracy " must needs be written large.
The first volume of the Memoirs was devoted to the conspiracy of the philosophers, Voltaire, D'Alembert ' Frederick II, and Diderot—"Voltaire the chief, D'Alembert the most subtle agent, Frederick the protector and often the adviser, Diderot the forlorn hope"251.—these were the men who originally leagued themselves together "in the most inveterate hatred of Christianity."252. Bringing out into bold relief the most malignant and brutal of the anticlerical and anti-Christian utterances of Voltaire and his friends,253. as well as all available evidence of a crafty strategy on the part of the conspirators to avoid detection of their plan,254. Barruel was emboldened to affirm a desperate plan to overturn every altar where Christ was adored, whether in London, Geneva, Stockholm, Petersburg Paris, Madrid, Vienna, or Rome, whether Protestant or Catholic.255.
The first definite step in this campaign of the philosophers is declared to have been the publication of L'Encyclopédie;256. the second, the suppression of the Jesuits and the widespread elimination of religious houses;257. and the third, the capture of the French Academy by the philosophers and the diversion of its honors to impious writers.258.
The foregoing were measures which primarily concerned "the chiefs," or "better sort."259. Efforts to extend the conspiracy to the hovel and the cottage were also made. Accordingly, appeals to toleration, reason, and humanity became the order of the day.260. These were intended to impress the populace and, by a show of sympathy with those who complained of their condition, prepare the way for the days of rebellion, violence, and murder which were yet to come.261. Free schools were established, directed by men who, privy to the great conspiracy, became zealous corrupters of youth.262. All was carefully calculated and planned to render possible the full fruitage of the designs of the conspirators when the harvest day should come.
Having thus dealt with the conspiracy against altars, Barruel turned in his second volume to consider the plot against thrones. The great inspirers of this covert attack upon monarchy were Voltaire, Montesquieu, and Rousseau. Voltaire, though by nature a friend of kings, whose favor and caresses were his delight, yet, since he found them standing in the way of his efforts to extirpate Christianity, was led to oppose them, and to substitute the doctrines of equality of rights and liberty of reason for his earlier emphasis upon loyalty to sovereigns.263. Unwittingly, through his Spirit of Laws, Montesquieu had helped on the antimonarchical resolution by his heavy emphasis upon the essential differences between monarchies and democracies, thus for the first time suggesting to the French people that they lived under a despotic government and helping to alienate them from their king.264. As for Rousseau, in his Social Contract he had widened the path which Montesquieu had opened.265. His doctrines had the effect of placing monarchy in an abhorrent light. They filled the minds of the people with a passion for Liberty and Equality.
The systems of Montesquieu and Rousseau, particularly, induced the Sophisters of Impiety to combine the task of overthrowing monarchy with the task of overthrowing religion.266. A sweeping attempt to poptularize ihe leveling principles embodied in those two systems immediately developed. A flood of antimonarchical writings appeared,267. governments were sharply criticized, despotism was roundly denounced, the minds of the people were agitated and inflamed, and the notion of revolution was rendered familiar both by precept and example.268.
Some powerful secret agency was needed, however, to promote this vast conspiracy. The lodges of Freemasonry suggested a tempting possibility. The members of the craft gave ample evidence that they were susceptible.269. The occult lodges,270. moreover, already had traveled far toward the goal of revolution. All their protests to the contrary, their one secret was: "Equiality and Liberty; all men are equals and brothers; all men are free."271. Surely it would not be difficult for the enemies of thrones and altars to reach the ears of men who cherished such a secret, and to convert their lodges into council-chambers and forums for the propagation of the doctrines of impiety and rebellion.
An alliance was speedily consummated,272. and a fresh torrent of declamation and calumnies, all directed against the altar and the throne, began to pour through these newly discovered subterranean channels.273. The Grand Orient constituted a central committee which as early as 1776 instructed the deputies of the lodges throughout France to prepare the brethren for insurrection.274. Condorcet and Sieyès placed themselves at the head of another lodge, to which the Propaganda was to be traced.275. In addition, a secret association bearing the title Amis des Noirs created a regulating committee, composed of such men as Condorcet, the elder Mirabeau, Sieyès, Brissot, Carra, the Duc de la Rochefoucauld, Clavière, Lepelletier de Saint-Fargeau, Valade, La Fayette, and Bergasse.276. This regulating committee was also in intimate correspondence with the French lodges of Freemasonry. Thus a powerful secret organization was at hand, composed of not less than six hundred thousand members all told, at least five hundred thousand of whom could be fully counted upon to do the bidding of the conspirators, "all zealous for the Revolution, all ready to rise at the first signal and to impart the shock to all other classes of the people."277.
However, all these machinations might have come to naught had it not been for the encouragement and direction supplied by the Illuminati. In the latter Barruel saw the apotheosis of infamy and corruption.278. With diabolical ingenuity the chiefs of the Illuminati succeeded in evolving an organization which put into the hands of the conspirators, i. e., the philosophers and Freemasons, the very, instrument they needed to give full effect to their plans. The superiority of that organization was to be seen in its principles of general subordination and the gradation of superiors in the minute instructions given to adepts and officers covering every conceivable responsibility and suggesting infinite opportunities to promote the order’s welfare, and in the absolute power of its general.279. Thus was built up a hierarchy of savants, an association held under a most rigid discipline, a formidable machine capable of employing its maximum power as its governing hand might direct,280. With the close of the third volume Barruel considers that he has been able to present a complete "academy of Conspirators."281.
Barruel’s last volume, the most formidable of all, was devoted by its author to the forging of the final link in his chain: the coalescence of the conspiring philosophers, Freemasons, and Iluminati into the Jacobins. To establish a connection between the "illuminated" Masons and the immediate "authors and abettors of the French Revolution,"282.i. e., the Jacobins, Barruel had recourse to the familiar inventions of the reappearance of the Bavarian Illuminati after its suppression,283. the rise and corrupting influence of the German Union,284. that treacherous "modification of Weishaupt’s Minerval schools,"285. and, particularly, the, pretended mission of Bode and von Busche to Paris.286.
With respect to this last invention, no more worthy of our comment than the others except for the fact that it was supposed to supply the direct point of contact between the conspirators and the French Revolution, Barruel was obliged to admit that he was unable to place before his readers evidence of the precise character of the negotiations that took place between the deputation from Berlin and the French lodges:287. "facts" would have to be permitted to speak for themselves.288. These "facts" were such as the following: the lodges of Paris were rapidly converted into clubs, with regulating committees and political committees;289. the resolutions of the regulating committees were communicated through the committee of correspondence of the Grand Orient to the heads of the Masonic lodges scattered throughout France;290. the day of general insurrection was thus fixed for July 14, 1789;291. on the fatal day the lodges were dissolved, and the Jacobins, suddenly throwing off their garments of secrecy and hypocrisy, stood forth in the clear light of day."292.
His last two hundred pages were devoted by Barruel to arguments shaped chiefly to show that the principles of the Revolutionary leaders were identical with the principles of the illuminated lodges;293. that the successes of the Revolutionary armies, of Custine beyond the Rhine,294. of Dumouriez in Belgium,295. of Pichegru in Holland,296. and of Bonaparte in Italy, in Malta, and in Egypt,297. were explicable only on the ground of treacherous intrigues carried on by the agents of Illuminism; and that no country, moreover, need flatter itself it would escape the seductions and plots of the conspirators. The dragon’s teeth of revolution were already sown in Switzerland, in Sweden, in Russia, in Poland, in Austria, in Prussia, and in America.298. With Barruel’s comment upon America,299. our discussion of the Memoirs of Jacobinism may well come to a close.
As the plague flies on the wings of the wind, so do their triumphant legions infect America. Their apostles have infused their principles into the submissive and laborious negroes; and St. Domingo and Guadaloupe have been converted into vast charnel houses for their inhabitants, So numerous were the brethren in North America, that Philadelphia and Boston trembled, lest their rising constitution should be obliged to make way for that of the great club; and if for a time the brotherhood has been obliged to shrink back into their hiding places, they are still sufficiently numerous to raise collections and transmit them to the insurgents of Ireland;300. thus contributing toward that species of revolution which is the object of their ardent wishes in America.301. God grant that the United States may not learn to their cost, that Republics are equally menaced with Monarchies; and that the immensity of the ocean is but a feeble barrier against the universal conspiracy of the Sect!
: The literary relationship between the works of Robison and Barruel is of sufficient interest and significance to warrant some comment. Robison’s volume was published before its author saw Barruel’s composition in its French text.302. Later, Robison was moved to rejoice that Barruel had confirmed his main positions and contentions. A few things in the Memoirs of Jacobinism, however, impress him as startling. He confesses that he had never before heard the claim seriously made, that "irreligion and unqualified Liberty and Equality are the genuine and original Secrets of Free Masonry, and the ultimatum of a regular progress through all its degrees."303. He is driven to assert that this is not the secret of Masonry as he has learned it from other sources. Robison also recognizes differences in the two works respecting the exposition of certain Masonic degrees, For his part he is not willing to admit that his sources are unreliable.304.
Barruel, on the other hand, did not get sight of Robison’s volume until just as his third volume was going to press.305. He comments in part as follows: "Without knowing it, we have fought for the same cause with the same arms, and pursued the same course; but the Public are on the eve of seeing our respective quotations, and will observe a remarkable difference between them."306. That difference Barruel attempts to explain on the ground that Robison had adopted the method of combining and condensing his quotations from his sources. Besides, he thinks his zealous confederate "in some passages . . . has even adopted as truth certain assertions which the correspondence of the Illuminées evidently demonstrate to have been invented by them against their adversaries, and which," he continues, "in my Historical Volume I shall be obliged to treat in an opposite sense.307. Barruel also differs with Robison respecting the time of the origin of Masonry.308. But all such matters are of slight consequence; all suggestions of opposition and disagreement between Robison and Barruel are brushed aside by him in the following summary fashion: ". . . It will be perceived that we are not to be put in competition with each other; Mr. Robison taking a general view while I have attempted to descend into particulars: as to the substance we agree."309.
It was one of the most confident boasts of the supporters of the idea of a "conspiracy against thrones and altars" that these two writers, Robison and Barruel, had worked at the same problem without the knowledge of each other’s effort, and thus following independent lines of investigation, had reached the same conclusion. The merit of the claim may safely be left to the reader’s judgment.

Vernon [L.] Stauffer, New England and the Bavarian Illuminati. Studies in History, Economics and Political Law, edited by the Faculty of Political science of Columbia University. Volume LXXXII, Number 1. Whole Number 191. Chapter III, pp. 142-228. New York: The Columbia University Press, Longmans, Green & Co., Agents. London: P. S. King & Son, Ltd., 1918. (Dean and Professor of New Testament and Church History, Hiram College) 374 pages.
Roots of twentieth century conspiracy theory
The following notes are paraphrased or excerpted from The Mythology of the Secret Societies by John M. Roberts.1 They provide little narrative continuity but may be of use to those with some previous exposure to the topic. A simple keyword search may be more helpful than reading through the whole page.
John M. Roberts, Fellow and Tutur of Magdalen College, Oxford and editor of Purnell’s History of the 20th Century, has given us a valuable insight into the "spectre that haunted European politics in the 18th and early 19th centuries."
This is not an history of secret societies, real and imagined. This is an history of the mythology that grew out of a belief that everything had a cause—therefore behind everything that happened in the world, there was someone causing it. John M. Roberts clearly demonstrates that much of the direction of 19th century politics was influenced, not by secret societies, but by a belief on the part of rulers in their existence and power.
A review can be found in Vol. LXXXVI of Ars Quatuor Coronatorum.

The source of two conspiracy claims of the twentieth century, the Revue internationale des Sociétés Sècretes, began publication in 1912 in Paris. [Edited by L'abbé Ernest Jouin (1844-1932).] In the July 1914 VIII issue, p. 12, the accusation was made that the Sarajevo assassination2 was an anti-catholic, anti-papal plot. Later on p. 702 appears the claim that Lenin belonged to a secret masonic lodge in Switzerland. [p. 2]
Nesta H. Webster’s 1924 Secret societies and subversive movements, reprinted 1964, World Revolution, The plot against civilization, London 1921, and other books — all reprinted well into the late twentieth century — trace all revolutionary upheavals to the Bavarian Illuminati. Her Surrender of an Empire, London 1931, identify Wafd, Sinn Fein, Zionism and Bolshevism as all the same threat. [p. 3]
Nineteenth century conspiracy theories:
Disraeli is typical of his contemporaries when he expresses the widely held mythology of conspiracies in his novels, specifically Lothair, exploiting the mid-century excitement over an apparent Roman Catholic resurgance in England, the closing days of the Italian Risorgimento, and the overthrow of Rome’s temporal power.
Disraeli also expressed his concerns in Lord George Bentink, A Political Biography London: 1852, pp. 553-4 and in 1856 he warned the House of Commons about secret societies in France, Italy and Germany [Hansard, H. of C. debates, III series, cxliii, 773-1, 14 July 1856] Later at the annual dinner of the Royal and Central Bucks Agricultural Association at Aylesbury, 20 September 1876, he warned again of the danger of secret societies responsible for the Serbian attack on Turkey. [p. 7]
"Between 1789 and 1848 there was almost everywhere in Europe a great general acceleration of social and political change, a spread of certain common institutions in the place of particular and local ones, and a generalising of certain ideas which may loosely be called liberal. Educated and conservative men raised in the tradition of Christianity, with its stress on individual rsponsibility and the independence of the will, found conspiracy theories plausible as an explanation of such change: it must have come about, they thought, because somebody planned it so." [p. 10]
"With the notable exception of some masonic historians and a few Italians excavating the roots of the Risorgimento the whole subject of secret societies was neglected as an area for serious investigation until twenty or thirty years ago. Because the historian passed by, the charlatan, the axe-grinder and the paranoic long had the field to themselves." [p. 10]
The full flower of this mythology, 1815 to 1848 occured after the secret societies ceased to be an effective political factor. [p. 14]
Early anti-masonry:
A London fly-sheet of 1698, addressed 'to all Godly people' warned believers that membership of the Craft might endanger their salvation, 'For this devillish sect are Meeters in secret which swere against all without their Following. They are the Anti-Christ which was to come leading them from Fear of God. For how should they meet in secret places and with secret Signs taking care that none observe them to do the Work of God; are not these the Ways of Evil-dom?" [Early Masonic Pamphlets, ed. D. Knoop, G.P. Jones and D. Hamer (Manchester, 1945), p. 34.]
Political suspicion in a 1676 flysheet extends to freemasons: "Modern Green-ribbon'd Caball, together with the Ancient Brotherhood of the Rosy Cross; the Hermetick Adepti, and the Company of Accepted Masons" [AQC, xlv, 1935, p. 312]
Harassment of Freemasonry by Cardinal Fleury appears to be a personal and temporary preoccupation motivated by suspicion of court intrigue [p. 66]
F. Sbigoli, Tommaso Crudeli e i primi framassoni in Firenze (Milan, 1884): anti-clerical tendencies of Florentine masonry lead to incarceration of one of the lodge members by the Inquisition in 1739.
The Bull of 1738 issued by Clement XII (1730-1740) was never officially received by the Neopolitan government. [p. 72] It was also never legally received in France and never submitted to the Parlament of Paris for registration [p. 66]
The story that Benedict XIV was a freemason appears in a 1752 pamphlet criticising the Bull of 1738.
Papal Bulls of the 1700s condemning Freemasonry did not evoke wide spread enthusiasm and support from secular authority and clergy continued to belong to lodges. [p. 79]
"The elements of anti-masonry, though often present together, were still distinct and political suspicion arose only in special, local circumstances or from a general conservatism, rooted in Roman Law traditions, about the undesirability of private association except under close public regulation." [p. 85]
Les Franc-Maçons écrasés, suite du livre intitulé, l'Ordre des Francs-Maçons trahi, traduit du latin (Amsterdam, 1747) attributed to the Abbé Larudan
Freemasonry Crushed, sequel to The Order of Freemasonry Betrayed, translated from Latin, contained the main theme that dominated political criticism of the Craft for the next quarter century. The accusations: the doctrine of Freemasonry is equality and liberty; it was founded by Cromwell (the Levellers conspired against the Protector’s life because he wished to change their name to that of freemasons); the avowed goals of rebuilding the social order actually mask the true goal—the subordination of mankind to the ordering of natural law and natural distinctions alone; and a dangerous toleration in religion.
Eighteenth century roots:
"In sheer numbers, there have probably never been so many secret sects and societies in Europe as between 1750 and 1789." [p. 90] Some came from [continental] Freemasonry being degenerate or schismatic, Some were independant or in opposition to Freemasonry. Some were lodges that were unwittingly overtaken by politic partisans. Regardless of their roots, many adopted the ritual and organization of Freemasonry.
There were three well known tendencies of the eighteenth century that were important influences on secret societies of the period. The first was a movement of thought summed up as "The Enlightenment," a rationalizing, secularizing tendency. This led men to mainstream Freemasonry.
The second was a tendency to "enlightened despotism," where the state began to interfer much more then previous with the traditional structure of society—in ways that a growing number of people found threatening, either to rank and privilege or to status and values. This benefited forms of Freemasonry which emphasized ancient nobility or transmission of ancient wisdom.
The third tendency was the growth of irrationalism. In part a reaction against both practical reforming rationalism and Enlightenment attitude, it had also other, older sources. "At its margins, too, lay religious exaltation, pietism and the enduring fascination of the lingering dream of a mystical—or even magical—approach to nature’s secrets." [p. 92] the theosophic movement and Cagliostro’s "Egyptian" masonry for example. "Occultism rubbed shoulders with pseudo -science." [p. 93]
The introduction of Scottish Freemasonry and pseudo-masonry and near-masonry into Germany coincided with a reaction against the Enlightenment. This lead to the eventual development of a legend connecting Freemasonry with the mediaeval Templars and a proliferation of grades and degrees of initiation.
Once thought of as the spiritual founder of the Scottish Rite, Chevalier Andrew Michael Ramsay (1696-1743) was admitted to a London lodge in 1730. As Grand Orator for the Grand Lodge of France, he gave a speech before that Grand lodge on 24 March 1737 [now known to have been on 27 December 1736], in which he referred to legendary masonic origins in the Crusades. Author of Apology for the Free and Accepted Masons, in 1736, he died in 1743 at St. Germain-en-Laye. Biographies of him include A Chérel, Un aventurier religieux au xviii siècle, André-Michel Ramsay (Paris 1926) Chevallier, Les ducs, pp. 144-54 [pp. 35-37]
Core of Rosicrucianism was a tradition of pietism and mysticism. Cross-fertilization between Freemasonry and explorers of the occult and mysticism attracted those alarmed by tendencies of the Enlightenment. The Order of Gold and Rosicrucians first appears in 1767.
Martinism, a name derived from the author of Des ereurs et de la vérité (1775), Louis Claude de Saint-Martin. Saint-Martin was a disciple of adventurer and seer, Martines de Pasqually who wrote the incomplete, Traité de Réintégration. Swedenborgian in view, Christian in origin, theurgic or magical in its implications, Martinism first appeared in the south of France in the 1750s under the name of Juges Ecossais. By 1760 it appeared in Paris, now known as the Elus Cohens. Martinist doctrines were carried into Freemasonry and increased the confusion as to what constituted Freemasonry. Martinism also popularized the general classification of seekers after revelations as 'illuminés', a term that was to take on a far different meaning in the next century. Mesmer’s Order of Universal Harmony, Cagliostro’s Egyptian Rite, a new system of Clermont (1758) etc. [pp. 103-105]
"On top of the network of orthodox masonic lodges had been built first the higher grades of Scottish rite lodges and then, on them, the Strict Observance, which had now fragmented into what were virtually a number of separate systems." [p. 112]
Karl Gotthelf, Baron Hund, 1755 introduced a new Scottish Rite to Germany, rectified masonry, after 1764 to be known as the "Strict Observance". They termed the English system of Freemasonry the 'Late Observance.' It was allegedly directed by unknown Superiors, appealed to German national pride and attracted the non-nobility.
John Augustus Starck joined Hund, claiming alchemical knowledge and a lineal descent, not from the Knights Templars, but from the Clerics of that Order, the true custodians of its secrets. A union was formalized in 1772 at Kohlo, where Hund’s dominance began to wain while Starck’s occult and hermetic ideology grew. [pp. 107-09]
Bode had been an early adherent of the Strict Observance and later made a notorious and unsuccessful visit to Paris, where he hoped to combat the mystical and theurgic tide in French masonry and turn the French lodges back towards a concern with greater social utility. He went back to Germany very disillusioned, but his visit was subsequently used by anti-masonic writers (see below) as evidence of international masonic conspiracy to bring about the French Revolution. Dittfurth was already a member of the Illuminati before the Convent opened. [The Convent of Wolfenbüttel, called in 1777 to settle internal issues of the Strict Observance, resulted in the secession of Starck and his followers]. [footnote, pp. 113-4]
Le Forestier’s Les Illuminés de Bavière et la franc-maçonnerie allemande, remains the fundamental study of the subject. For more on Bode and Dittfurth, see Le Forestier, Les Illuminés, pp. 361-2, 664-7 and 637-42.
The Illuminati of Bavaria
Weishaupt was promised the chair of natural and canon law held for ninety years by Jesuits but then, after their dissolution in 1773, vacant. "His specific original impulse may have been a desire to combat the clandestine and enduring influence of former Jesuits within the university; he rapidly rationalized difficulties growing out of his own rashness and taste for intrigue as the product of obscurantism and soon envisaged wider purposes for his society" [p. 120]
The illuminati, promoting the principles of egalitarianism and rationalism. began as a meeting of only five members; in 1779 it had 'colonies' in four other Bavarian cities and numbered fifty-four. [Le Forestier p. 44]. Their library of books on republicanism, natural rights and the ideas of Rousseau, though not easily available in Bavaria, were common enough elsewhere.
Weishaupt joined a Strict Observance lodge in 1777 to use its ritual to maintain the interest of the Illuminati members as well as to use the lodge structure for recruiting further members. By mid-1782 the order had about three hundred members, in Germany, Austria, Italy, Grenoble, Lyon and Strasbourg, and later to Bohemia, Milan and Hungary. "Only in France did the Illuminati meet with no success; the Grand Orient was wary of the mysterious new order, as it had been of the Strict Observance, and if, as was later alleged, an attempt was made to penetrate it, it certainly failed." [p. 125]
Adolph Franz, Baron Von Knigge had been a freemason, and had attempted to join a Rosicrucian lodge before being recruited to the Illuminati in Frankfurt in 1780. Knigge was more attracted to the mysterious and mystical than to Weishaupt’s rationalist idealism. A new set of subdivisions or grades required that the higher levels were only achieved by freemasons. At its peak in 1784 Le Forestier is able to identify 650 adepts. [p. 126]
Weishaupt deplored the quasi-religious forms and in July 1784 Knigge left the Illuminati. By this time other members had begun to talk and suspician was aroused both within the Strict Observance and the public at large. On June 23, 1784 the Bavarian Elector, Karl Theodor, published an edict forbidding his subjects to be members of secret or unauthorized associations. This was not specifically directed at the Illuminati but they suspended their meetings. Although Weishaupt approached the Elector and revealed most of its secrets, on March 2, 1785 another edict was published, this time condemning freemasons and illuminati explicitly. Weishaupt had already fled. In 1786 Franz Xavier von Zwack’s lodgings were raided (he had left Bavaria) and hundreds of papers were seized and published the following year as Einige Originalschriften des Illuminaten Ordens, Weche bei dem gewesenen Regierungsrath Zwack durch vorgenommene Hausvisitation zu Landshut den 11 und 12 Oktober 1786 vorefunden warden (Munich, 1787).
Weishaupt defended himself with his Apologie der Illuminaten in 1786 and two further volumes the following year. Further papers confiscated in the raid were published: Nachtrag von Weiteren Originalschriften (Munich, 1787). Knigge published his account in 1788:Philo’s endliche Erklärung und Antwort (Hanover, 1788).
In August 16 1787 a further Bavarian electoral edict prescribed the death penalty for recruiting for the Illuminati. [The Elector of Bavaria was a prince of the Holy Roman Empire with the right to participate in the election of the emperor (German king). Originally seven electors, the office in Bavaria was created in 1623 and abolished in 1778. The system disappeared with the abolition of the empire in 1806.]
Mirabeau’s three visits to Berlin between January and September 1786, and his sympathetic remarks regarding the Illuminati’s struggle against the Jesuits, lead to accusations that he had joined the Illuminati and had recruited the Grand Orient of France’s Grand Master, the Duke of Orléans.
Opposition to rationalism and reform was noisy even in the 1770s. One consequence of this was the foundation at Basle in 1780 of a secret 'Deutsche Christumsgesellschaft' in defense of Christian truths.
Jesuit complicity was a common thread in both accusations by Illuminatus and in anti-illuminatus writings in the 1789s.
A brief chronology of the French Revolution
February 1787:Assembly of "notables" called by Charles-Alexandre de Calonne
May 5, 1789:Estates-General met at Versaille
July 14, 1789:Parisian mob seized the Bastille.
Aug 4, 1789:National Assembly abolished feudal regime and tithe
Aug 26, 1789:Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen
Oct 5, 1789:Paris mob marched on Versaille, brought King to Paris.
June 20, 1791:Louis XVI tried to flee country.
April 20, 1791:France declared war on Prussia and Austria.
Aug 10, 1792:revolutionaries occupied Tuileries, imprisoned the royal family.
Jan 21, 1793:Louise XVI executed.
Sept 5, 1793:Reign of Terror (to July 27, 1794) by Committee of Public Safety
July 27, 1794:(9 Thermidor II) "White Terror" coup against Jacobins and Robespierre by National Convention
Oct. 5, 1795:Napoleon crushes Royalist attempt to seize power in Paris.
Nov, 1795:Directory established (until Nov 9, 1799)
Nov. 9, 1799:(Coup of 18-19 Brumaire VIII) Napoleon proclaimed end of the revolution and instituted Consulate.
"...the fallacy that to identify the [French] Revolution as a general process permits the inference that there must be a single general cause which explains it." They seem to make simple sense of very involved processes and, above all, provide an explanation which still attributes responsibility to human agents and can therefore provide a release for fear, indignation and moral outrage." "Plot theories of history prosper because of the need for such a release. [p. 149]
Long before interpreting the events of the French Revolution and assigning cause and responsibility, the 'facts' must be scrutinized with care.
"It was well known, for example, that the Duke of Brunswick was the head of the Strict Observance; when therefore, the Duke of Brunswick accepted defeat at Valmy in 1792 and so readily withdrew the allied army under his command, thus sparing a revolutionary France an almost certain defeat, the inference seemed to many people clear that a masonic understanding was at work between the two sides. The basic flaw in this inference lay in its premise, never questioned, that the duke was in each case the same great Germanic masonic dignitary; unfortunately, he was not. The two were uncle and nephew. This level of elementary confusion and inaccuracy is typical and must constantly be born in mind. From the start it vitiates many of the 'facts' alleged about freemasonry’s part in the Revolution." [p. 154]
G. Martin suggests that nearly five-sixths of the Third Estate were masons, but he wrote as a mason, proud to accept the charge of masonic responsibility for the Revolution and exaggerated manifestations of it. See the review by A. Mathiez, Annales historique de la Révolution française, 1926.
"This, however, by no means implies that all freemasons, even if they favoured the Revolution, approved of its effect on the life of the lodges. In Mayenne, for example, a lodge at Laval listened to one of its members pronouncing a eulogy of the States-General in early July 1789. Afterwards, another mason who was present opposed the reception of the text in the archives on the grounds that such a speech was a political act and therefore foreign to the principles of freemasonry. His view was taken sufficiently seriously for the matter to be referred to the Grand Orient for adjudication—and the objector’s point of view was subsequently upheld." [p. 156 (Bouton and Lepage, p. 92.)]
The circulars distributed to the lodges by the Grand Orient from 1788 to 1792 stress a masonic caution in public affairs and debate while demonstrating the Grand Orient moved with opinion, rather than ahead of it. [p. 157]
During the Terror both regimental and civil lodges disappeared and did not reappear until after Brumaire. [p.158]
"The eighteenth century mind, outside of England and North America, found it very difficult to grapple with the new world of political organisation whose most striking expression was the new invention of the political 'club'. People saw in the very existence of these new and unfamiliar bodies a sinister pattern. The Club Breton, for example, the source of the later and more famous Jacobin Club, was originally built (as its name suggests) around the Breton deputies who came to the States-General. Later, this fact seemed much less interesting to some people than the parallel fact that its original membership had been almost entirely masonic. One of its outstanding early leaders, Le Chapelier, was a well known freemason. It was recalled later that many of the Breton deputies had played an outstanding part in the pre-revolutionary struggles of the Breton Provincial Estates which in some ways had pre-figured, as if in rehearsal, the troubles of the States-General. It was de Kerengal, a freemason and a member of this group, who in the night of 4 August joined with d'Aiguillon (another freemason), to propose the abolition of feudalism." [pp. 158-9]
The Cercle Social, founded by Freemasons Nicolas de Bonneville, the author of Les Jésuites chassés de la Maçonnerie, and the Abbé Fauchet, ceased to meet after July 1791. It was a forum for the discussion of egalitarian and revolutionary views. [p 159]
Fauchet went to the guillotine with the leaders of the Gironde in October 1793. Bonneville’s friendship with Bode allowed later anti-masons to assert he was an Illuminati.
"Freemasonry, inevitably, reflected the concerns and ideas of the society which had produced it." [p. 163]
Any facts identifying Freemasonry with the Revolution evaporate after 1789. Orléans' motives are easily explained by personal ambition; he resigned his Grand Mastership in 1793 and ended on the scaffold. Lafayette, after Varennes, was out of step with the Revolution and Mirabeau’s Notes to the Court demonstrate his allegence to the throne — and he may not have been a mason at all.
The contribution of freemasons can be seen in the early, and short lived, work of the National Assembly: philanthropic, libertarian, egalitarian and constitutionally progressive. But if there was a masonic plot, it backfired terribly: emigration drained membership from many lodges during the 1780s and by 1792 few lodges were active. Freemasons, on the whole constitutionalists, were labeled reactionary and unpatriotic, and later aristocratic. In 1792 a former Grand Master of the Templars, the Duc de Cossé-Brissac was lynched at Versailles, and in Orléans the lodges were sacked by sans-culottes in 1793. [p. 166]
From Thermidor (July 27, 1794) until the beginning of the Directory (Nov, 1795) there does not appear to have been any masonic activity.
The first post-Revolutionary attack on Freemasonry, by Abbé Antoine Estève Baissie, L'esprit de la Franc-maçonnerie dévoilé, relativement au danger qu"elle renferme (Rome, 1790) does not actually accuse freemasonry of engineering the Revolution but, one reference to the Cromwell theory aside, sticks to religious arguments.
The short book, Le voile levé pour les curieux ou les secrets de la Révolution révelés à l'aide de la franc-maçonnerie, Abbé François Lefranc (1791) may well be the first attack that explicitly blames the freemasons for the French Revolution of 1789-90. This book traces the roots of Freemasonry back to the French Protestant sect, the Socinians. Lefranc was a literary associate of Augustin Barruel (1741/10/02 - 1820/10/05) and Superior of the Eudiste Order, conspicuous in their opposition to Jansenism. [p. 170]
In December 1789 Cagliostro was arrested in Rome by the Inquisition. His confessions of alleged secrets of the Templars, the Strict Observance and the Illuminati’s plans to overthrow the Bourbons and attack the Papacy fuelled further anti-masonic publications.
A later book by Lefranc, Conjuration centre la religion catholique (Paris, 1792) shows the popular general confusion between Freemasonry, Martinism, Rosicrucianism and other secret sects. He also identifies Robespierre as being a freemason although there is no evidence of this fact. [p. 177]
The legend of Templar vengence was presented in 1796 in an anti-Jesuit version: de Molay was supposed to have founded four lodges, one in Edinburgh; they were associated with the Assassins and the Old Man of the Mountain; they supported Cromwell and were among the Superiors of the Society of Jesus; they were behind Cagliostro and Swedenborg; and they had stormed the Bastille. A thread of anglophobia and a claim that the conspiracy was ongoing was promoted through such persons as Charles Louis Cadet-Gassicourt (1769-1821) who was first in the field to produce such a wide ranging general conspiracy theory. See Le tombeau de Jacque Molay ou le secret des conspirateurs, à ceux qui veulent tout savoir... (Paris, An IV [1796]), Charles Louis Cadet-Gassicour.
Augustin de Barruel (b. 1741-Oct. 5, 1820) author of Mémoires pour servir à l'histoire du jacobinisme, first published in 1797 and later to be the blueprint for twentieth century conspiracy mythology. The same year an English translation appeared in London. His many errors and confusions, and his reliance on the Originalschriften, were irrelevent to the welding together of Freemasonry and the Illuminati with the secret society mythology. [p. 195]
Much of his third volume is partially drawn from notes supplied by Starck who was also attempting to provide justification for his own involvement. But Barruel was not interested in any separation of blame and included none of Starck’s notes on the blamelessness of Freemasonry before the Illuminati infiltrated it. In his simplifications, Barruel overlooks evidence of distinctions within Freemasonry that would have strengthened his case; for a theologan he was careless about ideological and doctrinal distinctions and wrote nonsense about Swedenborg and the Martinists; he mistranscribes and misreports; he cribs, uncritically, stories which to anyone with any knowledge of the events, would undermine his argument; he is clearly ignorant of many well known facts and relies on private information without attempting to confirm it. [p. 199]
Joseph de Maistre, an active freemason and student of mysticism, wrote a long, unpublished refutation of Barruel, exploiting his poor logic and exposing his errors of fact. Later, in his Les Soirées de St Petersbourg (Lyon, 1874). II pp. 265 ff., he was to attack individual Illuminati for their revolutionary acts but he always excluded mainstream Freemasonry from any blame. [p. 297]
The Monthly Review, [January-April 1798, p. 510.] pointed out that 'of the Abbé Barruel’s three conspiracies, Anti-Christian, Anti-monarchial, Anti-social, each successive one has been brought forward with diminishing evidence and decreasing plausability.' [p. 200]
Refutations soon began to appear for there were many alive who could testify personally to his assertions; the most celebrated is that of J.J. Mounier, De l'inflence attribuée aux Philosophes, aux francs-maçons et aux illuminees sur la Révolution de France (Tübingen, 1801) [p. 200]
The Philosophes—any of the literary figures of eighteenth century France who were inspired by René Descartes, the skepicism of the Libertins, or freethinkers, and the popularization of science by Bernard de Fontenelle — was dominated by Voltaire and Montesquieu; they were united in a conviction of the supremacy of human reason.
After the French Revolution ruling classes across Europe began repressive police action against all clubs and societies. This tended to drive freemasons into hostility to their government and sympathy with the Revolution.
There was a great outcry in the 1790s in England against Jacobins, soon a synonym for revolutionaries. The educated English classes though did not accept the mythology of secret societies. [p. 206]
The ideologically opposite Edmund Burke virtually ignored the topic, only mentioning the Illuminati, in Reflections, in a footnote (Cambridge, 1912), [p.58]
The Report of the Committee of Secrecy [15 March 1799.] to the English House of Commons advised that systematic conspiracies by secret societies was to be feared, but did not mention Philosophes, Illuminati or freemasons. The English feared secret societies such as the United Irishmen, but freemasons were specifically excluded from the Unlawful Societies Act of 1799. [p. 208]
"In 1791 came what seems to have been the first published statement outside France of the link between intellectual and political revolution and secret societies, a pamphlet by the former Illuminatus, Eckartshusen: Über die Gefahr, die dem Thronen, dem Staaten und dem Christenhume dem gänzlichen Verfall drohet, durch das falsche Sistem der Leutigen Aufklärung und die kechen Anmasoungen sogennanter Philosophen, geheimer Gesellschaften und Sekten. (Munich, 1910)
L.A. Hoffmann founded the anti-illuminati Weiner Zeitschrift in 1791, in which Johann Georg Ritter von Zimmermann (1728-95), a Swiss doctor and author, contributed anti-masonic pieces. He created the conservative secret society 'The Association' in reply to the great Jacobin conspiracy that collapsed with Leopold II’s death (1737-92).
In 1794 a "plot" was discovered. Four groups of discontented persons were meeting in Hungary and Vienna for discussion and the distribution of anti-feudal reform propaganda. One member, Martinovics, had founded two secret societies both demonstrating Illuminati and masonic influences. Upon his arrest in 1794 he became a key informant. This incident confirmed the dangers of systematic secret societies in the ruling classes of the Habsburg dominions.
Johann August Starck (1741-1816) precipitated the crypto-Catholic accusations against the Strict Observance and the alleged Jesuit plot to undermine Protestantism. In 1787, Starck’s break from Hund complete, he published a 1200 page reply to his critics: Über Kryptokatholicismus, Proselytenmacherey, Jesuitismus, geheime Gesellschaften, (Frankfurt and Leipzig). In it he also sees the Illuminati as the cause of the French Revolution. Articles in Eudämonia, some ascribed to Starck, continued the theme that the Illuminati were still at work and plotting to stifle the sale of Barruel’s book in Germany. In 1797 an imperial decree in Austria suppressed this and similar journals. Starcke viewed Knigge as the source of the Illuminati’s evil nature, not Weishaupt. [p. 218] In 1803 Starck published the Triumph der Philosophie im 18 Jahrhundert, a complete account of his conspiracy theory starting with the Greek philosophers and working his way through mediaeval heresies up to the Aufklärung and Illuminati.
The Babeuf conspiracy and Buonarroti
Babeuf’s abortive plot would be forgotten except for Buonarroti’s 1828 Conspiracy of Equals. The plot itself had no impact but Buonarroti’s book provided fuel to the mythology. Buonarroti’s would later build a career as the Grand Old Man of secret societies, advising republican revolutionaries in Italy right down to a young Mazzini.
Filippo Giuseppe Maria Ludovico Buonarroti (1761-1837), although he achieved nothing, did more to give reality to the spectre of the universal conspiracy. Born of a noble family in Pisa, he early expressed egalitarian views and in April 1790 began publishing the short lived Giornale Patriottico di Corsica in Corsica. This was the first Italian language newspaper to support the French Revolution. It appears that he was a freemason and may have joined an Illuminati-influenced lodge in 1786. He was escorted off the island in June of 1791 in reaction to his anti-clerical work as director of the island’s administration of ecclesiastical affairs and national lands appropriated from the Church. He was briefly jailed in Tuscany and returned to Corsica in July.
He made his second visit to Paris in 1793, where he denounced Paoli to the Convention and was rewarded for his long revolutionary services by a special decree of nationalization as a French citizen on May 25th. [p. 230]
He was closely allied with Robespierre’s admirers and his notions of revolution clearly contained a large element of economic egalitarianism. [p. 231] Early in 1794 he was posted to Oneglia as administrator where he was courted by Italian refugees and Jacobins from the other Italian states. He was already experiencing local opposition when the events of Thermidor removed his friends in Paris from office. He was recalled to Paris in March 1795 and locked up in the Plessis prison where he met "Gracchus" Babeuf (b. 1760). Babeuf and Buonarroti were in jail together from March to October 1795.
On two occasions Babeuf sought membership in masonic lodges but was not successful. [M. Dommanget, 'Babeuf et la franc-maçonnerie' in Sur Babeuf et la conjuration des égaux (Paris, 1970), pp. 60-8.] He earned a living as a Paris journalist when the revolution came; later attacked Mirabeau; after Thermidor he attacked the still Robespierrist Commune of Paris. [p. 233-4]
The Directory of 1795 revealed that France was now to be ruled by the well-to-do, prompting much outraged egalitarian sentiment. Babeuf and Buonarroti, agreeing on the merits of Robespierre’s ideas, also adopted Buonarroti’s understanding of the conspiratorial techniques needed to fight a determined government. The Babeuf conspiracy, the Society of the Panthéon, discussed egalitarian ideas and published a newspaper, the Tribun du Peuple, throughout France.
In February 1796 the police of the Directory silenced the Tribun. The society ceased to meet but Babeuf formed a smaller 'comité insurrecteur'. Their manifesto, drafted by Sylvain Maréchal, called for the restoration of the unimplemented Constitution of 1793. Another objective was the penetration of the army, police and governmental machine through the work of twelve revolutionary agents, a plan that was almost immediately revealed to the authorities by an informer. On May 8, 1796 two hundred arrests were made; Babeuf and one other were executed, Buonarroti was imprisoned after the trial in February 1797.
It is possible that Maréchal was the informer, it is also possible he was a freemason and linked to the Bavarian Illuminati. [p. 236] There are few if any records, and no coherent account until Buonarroti’s book, thirty years later. "It had then been forgotten that Babeuf’s own evidence at his trial and after is flagrently opposed to any masonic interpretation of what he had done." [p. 237] [G. Pariset, 'Babeuvisme et Maçonnerie', in Mélanges offerts à M. Charles Andler par ses amis et ses él'eves (Strasbourg, 1924) p. 270]
Between 1800 and 1814 there was a pause in the development of the secret society mythology. A great deal of conspiracy went on, but it was closely observed and rooted out by the authorities. During the waning of the Napoleonic régime there were new developments as well as the inflating of Buonarroti’s career.
"Under the Consulate there was little evidence that masonic forms might be used as pretexts for the assembly of discontented ex-Jacobins. It cannot have amounted to much, because although Bonaparte’s first instinct had been to suppress masonry, he soon decided to use it instead. This delighted masons anxious for his patronage in order to re-establish the public respectability of the Craft." [pp. 252-3]
Italy’s thirteen political divisions were importantly different from each other in government, administration and economy. The influence of the French Revolution, prior to 1796, was felt through propaganda and cultural interconnections. After the French armies broke into the penninsula the influence was more direct.
One of the most important of the royalist organizations of the early 1800s, the Chevaliers de la Foi, was founded by Ferdinand de Bertier and other royalists who had been members of the Congrégation. Bertier joined a masonic lodge to make use of their ritual and appears to have been much influenced by Barruel although his goals were totally at variance with those of traditional masonry and Barruel’s legendary conspiritors. [pp. 257-8]
The organization prospered, although royalist émigrés were unsure if the group’s interest was with the Bourbons or the Pope.
What the Chevaliers seemed to have done was to have provided by adopting the legendary techniques and methods of the secret societies an instrument for the restoration of the moral order as effective as those which were believed to have overthrown it. Their example reinforced the widespread readiness to believe in the importance of conspiracy and clandestine organization as political techniques. [p. 259]
Left wing and republican opposition to Napoleon — old Jacobins, "salon" republicans or intellectual "Idéologues, and disgusted soldiers — provide the backdrop for several abortive attempts to overthrow Napoleon: Moreau, the Cadoudal plot of 1804, General Malet's and other royalist conspirators' attempted coup of 1808 and another royalist plot in 1813. [p. 260-1]
Without Buonarroti the link from 'Jacobin" conspiracies of the 1790s to the bogymen of the Restoration is almost non-existent. Most accounts are based on his reminiscences to Alexandre Philippe Andryane (1797-1863), published as Mémoires d'un prisonnier d'etat (Paris, 1838-9) and Souvenirs de Genève (Paris, 1839). [p. 327]
"Seemingly, he organized a Philadelphe group within a masonic lodge to which he belonged, the Amis Sincères. The Prefect, Capelle, became suspicious, and it is he who has provided the only evidence in contemporary official records that Buonarroti was a serious figure in the secret societies at this time." [p. 264]
Although Capelle reported regularly between 1802 and 1813 to the authorities in Paris, they did not take his reports seriously since they were based on hearsay.
What may be termed the first international political secret society, the Sublimes Maîtres Parfaits, was founded by Buonarroti, perhaps in 1808. Only freemasons were admitted to it. "It represented the abandonment of the idea of a coup in favour of an attempt to build a new community within a corrupt society which would eventually destroy it by undermining it at every point." [. 266]
"The Elect were aware that they were to work for a republican form of government; only the Areopagites knew that the final aim of the society was social egalitarianism, and the means to it the abolition of private property." [p. 266]
"Whether this society had any importance in conspiracy against Napoleon is doubtful. It has been connected with the republican opposition because the first members of the Sublimes Maîtres Parfaits seem to have been Philadelphes of neo-Jacobin and anti-Bonapartist origins. Given how little we know of the Philadelphes, though, this does not take us far. If we infer a deliberate attempt to take over masonic lodges we have an Illuminati parallel, and this seems a reasonable inference. But from the start Buonarroti had in mind a new conception, co-ordinating and directing secret societies all over Europe. This was to be carried out through the 'Grand Firmament', the directing body whose name may have been taken from the Philadelphes. Still with this aim, the Sublimes Maîtres Parfaits survived the Restoration, being re-organized in 1818 under the name of the Monde (whose notebook is the main source of our information about its organization and ideas), and built up its connexions with almost every secret society in Western Europe. Thus, for the first time, reality was given to the myth of the great conspiracy. In the 1820s, when the society was discovered, this became public knowledge." [p. 267]
"Paradoxically, whatever suspicions the police had of them, the Sublimes Maîtres Parfaits cannot be shown to have done anything at all that mattered beyond this, especially before 1815." "No one has yet shown....that the Sublimes Maîtres Parfaits did anything positive of significance except (later) to strengthen Metternich’s hand by being discovered. All that mattered was that they existed." [pp. 267-8]
The name Philadephes was a fairly common name for unrelated and disparate social groups and societies in the eighteenth century. [p. 268]
The 'littérateur' Charles Nodier (b. 1780) asserted the dangers of republican secret societies. His Histoire des sociétés secrèttes de l'armée (1815), published anonymously, was greeted with respect. Buonarroti’s involvement though is at best plausible and inferential. [p. 262] Although the Philadelphes were a reality, Nodier is not creditable, for example claiming to have spent twelve years in the army when in fact he never soldiered. [p. 269] References abound to the Philadelphes' origins of the Charbonnerie, while the Cadoudel conspiracy and the Malet plot assert the Philadelphes as a continuing element in opposition to Bonaparte. But all in all, "it is almost impossible to separate fact and fiction in Nodier." [p. 273]
Barruel received a letter from a correspondent in Italy, in 1806, chastising him for neglecting the influence of the Jewish ’sect'. This letter did not appear in print until 1878 as 'Les souvenirs du P. Grivel sur les PP. Barruel et Feller', Le Contemporain, July, 1878. This was the introduction of antisemitism into the anti-masonic legend. [p. 274-5]
"The best evidence, perhaps, that Italian Freemasonry was a political nullity is the appearance of other secret societies, the Spilla Nera, the Knights of the Sun, the Society of Universal Regeneration, the Decisi, the Centri, the Adelfi, the Guelfi and the Carbonari. [pp. 280-1] There were others and there were also a number of different groups using the same names. They were, in the main, anti-French or anti-Napoleonic. The Adelfi or Filadelfi may have been in communication with Buonarroti’s Sublimes Maîtres Parfaits and French Templar lodges.
"The carbonari must be placed with the freemasons, Jesuits and Illuminati as the greatest contributors to the mythology of the secret societies" [p. 283]
Their origins are obscure but they may have sprang from the Raggi or Lega Nera of the late 1790s. "It has been asserted that it was suspicion directed towards the Charbonnerie as a possibly counter-revolutionary organization during the Terror that in fact turned the interests of some of its members for the first time towards politics. Nodier suggested that it was awareness that masonic lodges would not do as vehicles for conspiracy which led plotters to seek to use the Charbonnerie for this purpose." [p. 284]
Pierre Joseph Briot, a republican and proponent of a united and independent Italy, was invited to Naples by Joseph Napoleon where he met Lucien Bonaparte and Saliceti. This may be the origins of the first Carbonari lodges in 1808. Many of the French officials in Naples supported and encouraged the growth of local patriotism. The carbonari drew its members from a wide range of anti-Napoleonic feeling, at one extreme those seeking a Bourbon Restoration, at the other, a growing middle and upper class progressive republicanism. This disparate membership created an ambiguous history. "We can only be fairly sure that by 1814 the political attitudes of the Carbonari boiled down to a generalised anti-French sentiment... and a broad disposition to favour constitutionalism." Some Carbonari also favoured the unification of Italy. If there were Illuminati elements, they were not remarked by contemporaries. [p. 288]
There also appeared a number of clandestine masonic lodges, breaking away from regular Freemasonry and coalescing with elements of dissident Scottish Rite lodges. Sòriga, in Le Società segreta, claims that some of these organized the Carbonari as a political instrument. [p. 286]
Although there is no evidence that the British in Sicily utilized clandestine organizations,the persistant fear that they sought to annex the island was promoted by Sòrega. [p. 287]
After 1819 another anti-Muratist, pro-Bourbon society was heard of, the Calderari, which is said to have denounced Freemasonry, Jansenists, materialists, economists and the Illuminat1 (Memoirs of the Secret Societies of the South of Italy, p. 71) [p. 293]
In 1811 the Savoyard, Joseph de Maistre asessed the political significance of the secret societies. "His only qualification of the innocence of Freemasonry was commonsense: if Freemasonry served the Revolution, it dd so per accidens. It was an association of clubs, many of whose members sumpathized with the Revolution (though this was not a function of their masonry). They were, therefore, likely to use the organization to which they belonged as a natural channel or framework for their activity in forming revolutionary clubs. [Derminghem, Joseph de Maistre mystique, pp. 88-90] [p. 295]
De Maistre provides a full scale refutation of Barruel’s book, denouncing it for errors of fact and simple bad logic. This refutation has been preserved among his papers.
During the Restoration, from 1815 to 1825, the secret societies became respectable as "the admired precursors of the nation-makers of the later nineteenth century, a role which exaggerated their effect and distorted their nature almost as much as the conservative slanders and misapprehensions" [p. 300]
Metternich’s fear of the secret societies appears in many of his writings. (Memoirs of Prince Metternich, London: 1881. III p. 453.) [p. 301]
"International affairs had been injected with an ideological issue, or rather, a series of issues: natural rights against prescription, nationality dynasticism, liberty versus order, contract versus status, the past versus the future." [p. 306] The end of fighting in Europe brought economic and social dislocation leading to Luddism, emigration and disturbances. A disposition to look for explanations in conspiracy simplified governmental response.
It is impossible to determine the number of discontented Italians belonging to secret societies. Opponents and members were equally anxious to exaggerate, and there is no complete list of the names of societies. [p. 307] Many agents and informers were unreliable, either publicity seekers, swindlers or adventurers. Often the result was unwise action; one example was the Austrian pursuit of freemasons in Lombardy in 1814 at a moment when many of them were actively sympathetic to the restored régime (R. J. Rath. The Provisional Austrian Régime, p. 193) [p. 311]
According to Francovich, the first reference to the Carbonari in the Tuscan police archives is in 1814 [p. 309]
Other societies, the Congregazione Cattolica e Apostolica Romana and the Consistoriali, were feared but never exposed and never did anything. In Germany the Tugendbund, an anti-Napoleonic movement, had no practical importance in the Restoration, yet Metternich believed it responsible for student unrest and the murder of the journalist Kotzebue in 1819. [p. 313]
There was also a specifically Bonapartist secret society, the Chevaliers de la Liberté. Republicans, disaffected by Napoleon, supported the Bourbon régime through L'Union, founded by Joseph Philippe Étienne Rey in 1816, and specific masonic lodges such as the Parisian Loge de amis de la verité. This lodge reinvented itself as the 'Haute Vente' of a new Charbonnerie. Some members were not republicans but wanted to bring in Napoleon II, or crown the Duc d'Orléans (son of the former Grand Master of French freemasonry). Their sum total effect was only to focus public attention on the mythology of secret societies and by 1823 the society was moribund, replaced in the public imagination by the Chevaliers de la Foi. [p. 321-2]
In the 1820s, secret societies such as L'épingle noire, Patriotes de 1816, Vatours de Bonaparte, Chevaliers du soliel, Patriotes européen réhd, La régéneration universelle, and others, achieved nothing other than reinforcing the plot theory of history. No less than nine major conspiracies were detected in seven months. Conservatives feared these societies and liberals were prepared to exaggerate their importance. [p. 316-7]
"By 1871 a federal German Empire based on universal suffrage and a united, constitutional Italy both existed; France was a republic. Such achievements were for fifty years the goals of German, Italian and French radicals and the secret societies contributed virtually nothing to them." [p. 317]
Buonarroti’s achievements in co-ordinating the secret societies of different countries were largely formal and meant little in practice. [p. 325] His 'Great Firmament', Metternick’s fears aside, probably never consisted of more than himself and one or two others, and never directed events. [p. 325]
One of the most celebrated informers of the period, Johannes Wit von Dörring cofessed to both Italian and German authorities and then published his memoirs. [p. 326] "He explained, it is true, that he had never been formally received in any secret society except by virtue of passing into its membership as a freemason." (Lemmi. pp. 31-2) [p. 327]
The 1822 arrest of an associate of Buonarroti, Alexandre Andryane, by the Milanese police did more than any other single event to substantiate and inflate official fear of secret societies in this period. [p. 327] (Androyane, Mémoires d'un prisonnier d'etat, Paris: 1838-9. Souvenirs de Genève, Paris: 1839) Androyane carried papers that revealed Buonarroti’s web of secret societies, giving life to the spectre of one great force behind all the separate manifestations of Europe’s revolution.
The Tuscan informer, Giuseppe Valtancoli, was a specialist in masonic rituals. He reported on the Carbonari and Guelfismo as well as the Sublimes Maîtres Parfaits though he thought they were called Adelfia. [p. 330] He also reported on the masonic rites which had remained separate from the Napoleonic structure such as the Old Scottish Templars. This mixture of ritual and conspiracy was familiar to a public prepared by Barruel and Lombard to accept the possibility of an illuminati threat. Wit’s memoirs stressed this link between nineteenth century political conspiracies grounded on some reality with the mythologies of the previous century. "The new 'facts' joined other evidence to become sources themselves, not merely for positive history of the secret societies (though historians have done much with such materials but also for its mythology." [p. 331]
"Wit , Valtancoli and others fed it for the future by providing those familiar with the sensational literature of the proceding twenty years with material confirming it. There were, after all, confessions by men who had been deeply involved in the events they described. This had a cumulative effect. The reinforcement which the informers and spies gave to the myth was sometimes effective at a very high level indeed. So was the unhappy Androyane’s evidence, and so at one further remove, were the untiring and practically ineffective labours of Buonarroti." [p. 331]
"Almost everywhere, the danger was exaggerated and essentially sporadic and disjoint conspiracy was misread as evidence of the existence of central co-ordinated direction." [p. 331]
"The paradoxes and curious reversals in the growth of the mythology are very striking. Successful police action against the societies increased the authorities' alarm because of what they discovered. Papal condemnation led to greater fear of them though it probably cut deeply into their popular support. Their practical failures, among them those of Buonarroti (surely the most inflated of bogies) helped the survival and strengthening of old fears of the ever present danger the societies were supposed to embody. As the continuing popularity of Barruel and the transmission of his tradition through such writers as Lombard de Langres shows, the mass of new details exposed by the receding of the revolutionary wave found an accepted structure of interpretation readily at hand. That much of the new data was baseless did not make it less acceptable and influential." [p. 334]
There was also a growth in publications aiming to satisfy a commercial demand for the inside story and explanation of Europe’s turmoil. "Most of its expression testify to the enduring sources of the myth’s strength: the ideas of secrecy, subversion, hidden superiors, ancient historical roots which offered keys to rapid, accelerating and inexplicable change." [p. 334]
Jakob Levi Bartholdy (17779-1825) published one of the first objective analysis of the secret societies, Memoires of the Secret Societies of the South of Italy in London in 1821. Unfortunately the public only remembered his sensational details confirming their worst fears, while glossing over the reasoned argument that these societies were, in the main, harmless and fading away. [p. 337]
By the mid-1820s there were books that damned the secret societies and others that praised them and legitimised them as precursors of liberalism and republicanism. One of the earliest attempts to place them in what was to evolve into the myth of the Risorgiment was L'Italie au dix-neuvième siècle, published anonymously by Francesco S. Salfi as early as 1821. [p. 338]
"...liberals began to integrate the story of the secret societies with the advance of liberty..." [p. 339]
Buonarroti arrived in Brusels in 1824 where he stayed until 1830, meeting his circle of old friends and fellow-exiles every day in a café. He moved to Paris in 1830 where he died in 1837. This period he spent encouraging other conspirators. What he actually was doing is unclear although he was closely involved with "M' in 1824-5 and a remodelled Sublimes Maîtres Parfaits now called Le Monde. [p. 341]
Buonarroti fed the mythology with the publication of his Conspiration pour l'Egalité in 1828, in which he celebrated the leaders of secret societies of the previous century. This book became the textbook for the communist movement in the 1830s and forties. It also confirmed the fears that many held that the secret societies were not merely seeking liberal reform but were deeply subversive of all social order. [p. 343] Buonarroti’s obsession with forms and rituals based on masonic, Illuminati and Rosecrusion traditions could not but suggest a direct continuity between these movements and his societies. [p. 343]
Mazzini, friend of Buonarroti, one time Carbonari and mason, became disillusioned with secret societies after 1831 and formed Giovine Italy, a clearly nationalistic society. [p. 344]
"Buonarroti was the ultimate source of enormous quantities of alarming information which came eventually into the hands of the authorities and helped to keep alive the fears of men like Metternich. Paradoxically, then, there was after all a continuity in the secret societies, just as their critics had always said, though it resulted in no effective action against the existing order and was imposed largely by one man. Nevertheless, that was enough for the myth to pass to the next generation, in which Louis Blanc could seriously state (and be believed) that Buonarroti was the heart of revolutionary Europe in those years. Such reality as there was in this claim was a mythical reality woven from illusion and self-deception." [p. 346]
The flow of literature has never stopped. From the cynical L. de la Hodde, Histoire des sociétés secrètes st du parti républicain de 1830 à 1848 (Paris, 1850) to the sincere C. Jannet, Les sociétés secrètes, there are many examples of the determination to force historical data into a predetermined frame, even when there is no special reason to do so. [p. 348]
"All these fears rest on simplifying, dramatising visions of politics. In the background there is still a belief in hidden manipulation. Those who hold them have abandoned some of the stage machinery, but the plot is the same." [p. 349]
"All human institutions can be described in terms of function, mythologies as much as any other. They are all responses to a need to master reality." [p. 349]
"...we deal with a mythology which even at its height was denounced on rational and empirical grounds and is clearly nonsense. Why then, were such ideas effective? Why are books embodying them still finding audiences?" [p. 350]


1. Unless otherwise noted, all excerpts are quoted from The Mythology of the Secret Societies. J.M. [John] Roberts, Fellow of Merton College, Oxford. Secker & Warburg, London: 1972 SBN: 436 42030 92. The murder of the Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife, Sophie, at Sarajevo in 1914 was also blamed on the freemasons in Miss. Elizabeth Durham’s The Sarajavo Crime:
"During the trial of Archduke Ferdinand’s killer, Gavrillo Princep testified that his colleague, Ciganovich, "told me he was a Freemason" and "on another occasion told me that the Heir Apparent had been condemned to death by a Freemason’s lodge." Moreover, another of the accused assassins, Chabrinovitch, testified that Major Tankositch, one of the plotters, was a Freemason." Mary Edith Durham, The Sarajevo Crime. London : George Allyn and Unwinn, Ltd., 1925, pp. 85-86.
She offered a document of the minutes of the trial of the murderers as evidence. This was proved to be a forgery of Father [Anton] Puntigam (d. 1926), a Jesuit of Sarajevo. "Substantial evidence pointed to the fact that the author had been the dupe of one named H. C. Norman, an anti-Mason, and one Horatio Bottomley (1860/03/23-1933/05/26), later proved to be a swindler." [AQC Vol 80 (1968) p. 251]
"Her document purported to have been written by 'Professor Pharos'; it was discovered that "Professor Pharos" was Father Puntigam, leader of the Jesuits in Sarajevo. Even the Rev. Father Hermann Gruber, S. J., who was an Anti-Mason by profession, protested against this dreadful hoax; he pointed out among other things that whereas the assassins were under twenty years of age, it was the common rule in Danubian Masonry to accept no candidate under twenty-five."
Supplement to Mackey’s Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, H. L. Haywood. Richmond, Virginia : Macoy Publishing, 1966. p. 1361.
Jedediah Morse and the Illuminati
The Reverend Jedediah Morse, (1761/08/23 - 1826/06/09), author of the first American geography and gazetteer and minister of the Congregational church in Charlestown, 1. is remembered mainly for his promotion of an Illuminati scare in New England in 1798-99.
A strong Federalist during a period of public disenchantment with the course of the French Revolution, Morse’s promotion of
John Robison’s Proofs of a Conspiracy found ready supporters. In three sermons, the first delivered May 9th, 1798, Morse warned of an Illuminati conspiracy. His second sermon on November 29th, 1798 attempted to answer charges that he had provided no proof, but also failed to provide proof. In his third sermon on April 25, 1799 he claimed to have found his proof of an Illuminati presence in Virginia.
In the face of growing criticism, Morse undertook further research which clearly demonstrated that Robison’s accusations were not taken seriously in Europe, and that what he thought was an Illuminati conspiracy in Virginia was merely a regular lodge of Freemasons. He was unable to find a trace of the several Illuminati lodges that Robison claimed had been established in America prior to 1786. (Proofs of a Conspiracy, etc. p. 202.)
Discredited, and an object of some ridicule, from this time on Morse wrote nothing further on the Illuminati. With the exception of the occasional partisan attack,
9. nothing further was heard on the topic until 1829 during the formative period of the Anti-Masonic Party.
The following quotes and notes clearly show that Morse’s claims were unsubstantiated and that the promotion of his claims were motivated and fueled by partisan politics.

'The Federalists, who stood for the importance of a strong central government, found themselves confronted with an organized opposition to which in time the terms Anti-Federalists, Republicans, and Democrats were applied. [p. 103.] 2.
'The term "Republican" was one of the by-products of the discussion which arose in this country, from 1792 on, over French revolutionary ideals. [p. 103.]
'The stir created by the activities of [French minister] Genet, great as it was, soon was swallowed up in the excitement produced by the sudden emergence of a new factor in American politics; viz. indigenous political organizations that were secret. [p. 105.]
'These Democratic Societies, or Clubs, were destined to exert a degree of baneful influence upon political feelings out of all proportion to their actual number and weight. [p. 106.]
'...not more than twenty-four separate organizations of this character were formed within the two years which followed their first appearance.3. [p. 106.]
'The fact that at least five of these Democratic Societies were located in New England strongly suggests the immediate concern which the people of that section were bound to have because of these unexpected and ominous secret political associations. The creation of the Boston Society became at once the occasion of virulent opposition and infuriated comment. Organized in the late fall of 1793 under the innocent title, the Constitutional Club, the principles and alliances of the organization became quickly known, with the result that the already agitated waters of local party feeling were disturbed beyond all previous experience. Citizens whose sympathies were fully with the conduct of affairs under the Federalist régime were quick to believe that henceforth they might expect to be threatened, brow-beaten, and checkmated in a ruthless and scandalous fashion because of the activities of this pernicious Club.
'The vote was appreciably increased and elections were more hotly contested on account of the emergence of the Clubs. The Independent Chronicle, Jan. 16, 1794 contains the Rules and Regulations and the Declaration of this society. [p. 107.]
'...having vehemently espoused the cause of France in a rabidly democratic spirit, they consequently added enormously to the passion and suspicion of the day.
'Thus they not only helped to make the strife of parties vituperative and bitter; in addition they made familiar to the thought of a great body of citizens in America the idea that the intrigues of secret organizations must needs be reckoned with as one of the constant perils of the times.' [p. 113.]
Rev. Jedediah Morse expressed his concern about these Clubs in correspondence with Oliver Wolcott, Comptroller of the US Treasury, and in his Fast Day sermon of May 9, 1798 and Thanksgiving sermon of Nov. 29, 1798 [p. 114-15.]
The treaty with England, negotiated by John Jay, signed by Washington, and promulgated February 29, 1796 was unpopular. Viewed as a surrender to the British and an injury to the French cause, it also had the effect of weakening the Federalist attacks on Democratic Clubs.
Morse’s Fast day sermon, wherein he detailed the accusations made in Proofs of a Conspiracy against all the religions and Governments of Europe, precipitated the Illuminati controversy. [p. 233.]4.
Morse is quoted in the Independent Chronicle, June 14, 1798 stating he had purchased a copy of Proofs in Philadelphia in mid April. He had first heard of the book from a Scottish correspondent in January, 1897. [p. 233.]
Morse did not mention any link to Freemasonry [p. 235.] In footnotes to the published text of the sermon he said that Illuminism had been grafted onto European Freemasonry and that it had not appeared in North America; Washington’s association with the craft demonstrating its blamelessness. [p. 236.]
'...the air of New England was already surcharged with notions of implacible hostility to the forces in control of church and state, and with gloomy forebodings born of surmises of intrigue and conspiracy.' [p. 238.]
On May 24, 1798, a pseudonymous contributor to the Independent Chronicle, "An American", questioned Morse’s source and noted that The Critical Review, or Annals of Literature, London, 1797, had criticized Robison’s accuracy. [p. 242.] In contrast, the London Review, of January, 1798, ran a favourable review of Robison’s book. [p. 243.]
Rev. David Tappan, professor of divinity at Harvard warned graduating students on June 19, 1798 about the dangers of the Illuminati [p. 244.] Theodore Dweight, brother to Yale’s president, commented on Robison’s claim that Illuminism had travelled to States by suggesting that Jefferson, Albert Gallatin [1761-1849], and other republicans would be sympathetic to illuminism. [p. 253.]
An article in the Massachusetts Mercury, July 27, 1798 written by "Censor" asked Morse to provide some proof of his assertions that several lodges of the Illuminati had been established in America. [p. 254.]
Morse wrote articles, published in the Massachusetts Mercury for August 3, 10, 14, 17, 21, 28 and 31, attempting to defend his claim while — in articles on September 7, 14, 18, and 21 — also absolving American Freemasons of any suspicion. [p. 259.]
In an article by "A Friend to Truth" in the Massachusetts Mercury, Nov. 13, 1798, serious discrepancies were pointed out between Barruel’s and Robinson’s accounts.
A satire in the Massachusetts Mercury of Nov. 30, 1798 demonstrates the general scepicism that met Morse’s claim:
'The Illuminati esteem all ecclesiastical establishments profane, irreligious, and tyrannical; so do the Quakers. They hold also the obligation of brotherly love and universal benevolence. The Quakers not only profess these Atheistical principles, but actually reduce them to practice. The Illuminati hold the enormous doctrine of the Equality of mankind. so do these Quakers. They, like the Illuminati, have a general correspondence through all their meetings, delegates constantly moving, and one day, at every quarterly meeting, set apart for private business; and I engage to prove at the bar of any tribunal in the United States, that these Friends, these men so horribly distinguished for benevolence and philanthropy, (Ah! philanthropy!) have held, and do still hold a constant correspondence with their nefarious accomplices in Europe.... Awake. arise, or be forever fallen! [p. 263.]
In a footnote, Note F, pp. 67, to his Nov 29, 1798 sermon Morse attempted to link the Illuminati with "the Jacobin Clubs" as he termed the Democratic Clubs which he also accused of hiding behind the name of United Irishman, a society actually founded in Ireland about 1791, and arriving in America after the Irish Rebellion of 1798. [p. 271.] 5.
'On the whole, the idea of secret and systematic plottings against the liberties and institutions of the people of the United States was extensively promoted by clerical agency during the autumn and winter of 1798-99. [p. 276.]
In the Columbian Centinel of Jan. 5, 1799 a letter from Augustus Böttiger, counsellor of the Upper Consistory, and Provost of the College of Weimer claimed that "from 1790 on every interest in the Illuminati had ceased in that country." [p. 278.]
'At Hartford, next to Boston the main center of the Illuminati agitation in New England, two papers, the American Mercury and the Connecticut Courant assisted materially in giving publicity to the controversy.' [p. 281.]
Theodre Dweight’s Fourth of July oration convinced one correspondent to the Aug. 6, 1798 Courant that Jefferson "is the real Jacobin, the very child of modern illumination, the foe of man, and the enemy of his country." [p. 283.]
Porcupine’s Gazette, edited by William Cobbett, and the Aurora General Advertisor, edited by Benjamin franklin Bache, both from Philadelphia, had wide national circulation; the former promoting Morse’s claims while the latter labelling it all an absurd collection of fantasies. [pp. 284-87.]
In Morse’s third and last sermon dealing with Illuminism, he claimed to have his proof: "I have, my brethren, an official, authenticated list of the names, ages, places of nativity, professions, &c. of the officers and members of a Society of Illuminati (or as they are now more generally and properly styled Illuminees) consisting of one hundred members, instituted in Virginia, by the Grand Orient of FRANCE." 6.
This document was a congratulatory letter from Wisdom Lodge No. 2660 in Portsmouth, Virginia, warranted by the Grand Orient of France, to the newly constituted Union Lodge No. 14 in New York, warranted by the Grand Orient of New York. The letter had been supplied to Morse by Oliver Westcott, whose Federalist party could only benefit from any attacks on republican sympathizers. [pp. 296-300.]
The American Mercury, June 6, 1799, pronounced Morse’s sermon to be absurd, as did the New England Farmer’s Weekly Museum. [p. 306.]
Morse had his supporters, but none provided anything resembling proof. An English translation of Barruel’s Memoirs arrived in America in June, 1799. [p. 309.] but Jefferson’s observations seemed to reflect the general impression of the public: indifference. [p. 312.]
The Mercury, Nov. 7, 1799, claimed that Professor Christopher D. Ebeling (1741-1817) of Hamburg had written, in reply to an inquiry by Morse, that Robison had no standing in Europe and that his book was a farrago of falsehoods and a wretched mass of absurdities. This claim was reprinted in the October 9, 1799 Bee and the Nov. 25, Dec. 6, 9, 1799 Aurora. [p. 313.]
In fact Ebeling had sent this letter to the Rev. William Bentley of Salem, Massachusetts at about the same time he was also corresponding with Morse. Bentley was an active Freemason who blamed Morse for calling Freemasonry into disrepute. From his correspondence with Ebeling, Bentley had reason to assume that the communications with Morse had been substantially the same — which they later proved to be. [p. 317.]
Investigating Lodge Wisdom, Morse wrote to Josiah Parker, member of Congress for Virginia. Parker responded that he had lived in Portsmouth and that the lodge was regarded as a reputable masonic society, harmless as far as fomenting hostiity to the institutions of the country was concerned. [p. 320.] 7.
'Henceforth, the reverberations of the controvery, with a single exception, were to be of the nature of jibes and flings on the part of irritated and disgusted Democrats who adopted the position that the controversy over the illuminati had been introduced into American politics to serve purely partisan ends. [p. 321.]
'In 1802, the Reverend Seth Ayson [1758-1820] minister of the Congregational church at Rindge, New Hampshire, made an effort to revive the agitation. 'Payson’s book was nothing more than a revamping of the earlier literature, European and American, on the subject. There is no evidence that it made the slightest impression on the country.' [p. 321.]
It is noteworthy that Morse, never condemning North American Freemasonry, or equating it with Illuminism, delivered a sermon before the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts on June 25, 1798. [p. 329.]
'Coincident with the breaking out of the controversy over the Illuminati, a number of tales of plots and conspiracies were foisted upon the public....' [p. 346.]
A taylor in Philadelphia was making uniforms for invading French soldiers, the French had massacred the crew of the American ship Ocean, a band of conspirators from the French Directory had taken ship from Hamburg to work sedition in America: all were rumours tracable to Federalist sources. [p. 346.] 8.
'Beginning with 1799 a small group of pamphlets appeared, dedicated by their authors to an effort to convert the charge of Illuminism into a political boomerang, to be employed as a weapon against the Federalists. [p. 348.] '...the word "Illuminati" had lost all serious and exact significance and had become a term for politicians to conjure with....' [p. 360.]
It was not until the disappearance of William Morgan that the specter of Illuminism was once again revived. An Abstract of the Proceedings of the Anti-Masonic State Convention of Massachusetts, held in Faneuil Hall, Boston, Dec. 30 and 31, 1829, and Jan. 1, 1830. Boston, 1830. [p. 5] notes the passage of a resolution "That there is evidence of an intimate connexion between the higher orders of Free Masonry and French Illuminism."
'On the ground that the length of the committee’s report made it inadvisable, the publishing committee deemed it inexpedient to print the "evidence."' [p. 345.]


1. Cf. The Life of Jedidiah Morse, D.D., New York, 1874; Memorablia in the Life of Jedediah Morse, D.D. by his son, Sidney E. Morse (Morse’s surname appears in the sources both as "Jedediah" and "Jedidiah"). Another son, Samuel Finley Breese Morse, was the inventor of the electric telegraph. ^
2. Unless otherwise noted, all quotes are from: Vernon [L.] Stauffer, New England and the Bavarian Illuminati. Studies in History, Economics and Political Law, edited by the Faculty of Political science of columbia University. Volume LXXXII, Number 1. Whole Number 191. New York: The Columbia University Press, Longmans, Green & Co., Agents. London: P. S. King & Son, Ltd., 1918. (Dean and Professor of New Testament and Church History, Hiram College) 374 pages. ^
3. Cf. Luetscher Early Political Machinery in the United Stares. p. 33. ^
4. A Sermon, Delivered at the New North Church in Boston, in the morning, and in the afternoon at Charlestown, May 9th, 1798, being the day recommended by John Adams, President of the United states of America, for solemn humiliation, fasting and prayer. By Jedidiah Morse. D. D., minister of the congregation in Charlestown, Boston, 1798, pp. 5-12 [p. 230.] ^
5. A Sermon, Preached at Charlestown, November 29th, 1798, on the Anniversary Thanksgiving in Massachusetts. With an Appendix, designed to illustrate some parts of the Discourse; exhibiting proofs of the early existence, progress, and deleterious effects of French intrigue and influence in the United States. By Jedidiah Morse. D. D., minister of the congregation in Charlestown, Boston, December, 1798. [p. 264.] ^
6. A Sermon, Exhibiting the Present Dangers, and the consequent Duties of the citizens of the United states of America. Delivered at charlestown, April 25, 1799, the day of the National Fast. By Jedidiah Morse. D. D., pastor of the church in Charlestown, Charlestown, 1799. p. 15 [p. 288.] ^
7.Cf. Wolcott Papers, 31; National Magazine, or a Political, Historical, Biographical, and Literary Repository, vol. ii, pp. 26 et seq article by Philalethes.^
8.Cf. McMaster, History of the People of the United States, vol. ii, pp. 441 et seq.^
9. John Wood (1775?-1822.) A full exposition of the Clintonian faction, and the society of the Columbian illuminati; Newark, Printed by Pennington & Gould, 1802. 56 p. 21 cm. LCCN: 17022844 ^


1 comment:

  1. This is an open invitation for all of you to become part of the largest organization in the world and reach the top of your career. As this year's recruiting programmer begins and our annual harvest party is almost at hand. The Grandmaster gave us the mandate to always reach people like you, so take this opportunity and join the great Illuminati organization, join our global unit. Bring the poor, needy and talented to
    The prominence of fame and wealth. Get money, fame, powers, security, get.
    recognized in your business, political career, ascend to the highest in whatever you do, be
    Protected spiritually and physically! All this you will achieve in
    a gleam of eyes

    The Illuminati have no association with Satanism, Luciferism or any religion. While our individual members are allowed to follow whatever deity they choose, we operate solely for the benefit and protection of the human species.

    Do you accept being a member of this new Illuminati world order?
    Call & WhatsApp +19735567426
    📩 carlosmacdonald234@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete